Hit enter after type your search item
Wzy Word

HERE ARE THE WORLD'S NEWS

Lou Dobbs Tonight 11/23/19 [HD] Full | Fox News Breaking News Nov 23, 2019

/
/
/
680 Views
img

[♪♪♪] LOU: GOOD EVENING THE RADICAL DIMMS AND THE 59 DAYS OF IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY FARCE THEY CONDUCTED FAILED MISERABLY TO PUT FORWARD A PLAUSIBLE PRETEXT WITH WHICH TO OVERTHROW PRESIDENT TRUMP

IBTHEY ALSO MANAGED TO BUILD PUBLIC SUPPORT FOR THE PRESIDENT HIS APPROVAL NUMBERS ARE ON THE RISE, DESPITE THOSE 59 DAYS SUPPORT FOR IMPEACHMENT ON THE DECLINE, AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE FORTUNATE TOO HAVE THE THANKSGIVING RECESS WITH WHICH TO RECOVER AND REGROUP BUT THOSE 59 DAYS OF ABSURDIST POLITICAL THEATER HAVE AWAKENED MILLIONS OF AMERICANS TO THE GREATEST POLITICAL SCANDAL IN OUR NATION'S HISTORY AND MORE EVIDENCE IS ON THE WAY THOSE DEMOCRATS APPEAR TO BE WELL ON THEIR WAY TO ELECTORAL DISASTER IN 2020

PRESIDENT TRUMP IS STRENGTHENED AND VALIDATED BY THE RADICAL DIMMS DISMAL AND DISASTROUS FAILURES OF THEIR SO-CALLED IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY THE PRESIDENT SAYS IN FACT HE WANTS A FULL TRIAL OF THE FACTS IN THE US SENATE PRESIDENT TRUMP EAGER TO EXPOSE FURTHER THE CORRUPTION AND BASELESS CHARGES OF THE DEEP STATE AND RADICAL DIMMS THAT TRACK BACK TO THE OBAMA WHITE HOUSE

PRESIDENT TRUMP CROWED ABOUT THIS BANNER WEEK FOR HIS PRESIDENCY >> TREMENDOUS THINGS ARE HAPPENING I THINK WE HAD A TREMENDOUS WEEK WITH THE HOAX, THE GREAT HOAX THEY CALL IT THE IMPEACHMENT HOAX THAT WORKED OUT INCREDIBLY WELL

AND WE HAVE TREMENDOUS SUPPORT LOU: THE FCC UNANIMOUSLY VOTED 5-0 TO BAN US TELECOM FROM USING FEDERAL SUBSIDIES TO BUY OR MAINTAIN EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT MADE BY CHINESE TELECOM COMPANIES HUAWEI AND ZTE, LABELING THOSE COMPANIES A NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT THE FCC ALSO BEGINNING THE PROCESS TO FORCE U

S TELECOM COMPANIES TO RE — TO REPLACE EXISTING PRODUCTS MANUFACTURED BY HUAWEI AND ZTE JOINING ME IS COMMISSION CHAIRMAN AJIT PAI LED THAT 5-0 VOTE TODAY AND JOINS US HERE TONIGHT GREAT TO SEE YOU CONGRATULATIONS ON THE VOTE

A CLEAR-CUT STATEMENT OF PUTTING US NATIONAL SECURITY, NATIONAL INTERESTS ABOVE COMMERCIAL INTERESTS AND CONGRATULATIONS TO YOU AND THE COMMISSION FOR DOING SO >> IT'S A UNANIMOUS VOTE AND WHEN IT COMES TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY OF OUR COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK, WE DO NOT KNOW ABOUT PARTY AFFILIATION

IT'S ABOUT THE SECURITY OF THE COUNTRY THE ATTORNEYEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES ANNOUNCING CLEARLY THAT BOTH THESE COMPANIES, HUAWEI AND ZTE POSED A NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT HE WENT FURTHER AND SAID IT'S THE CONDUCT OF THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA THAT GOES INTO THE ASSESSMENT OF THEIR NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT AND THE RISK POSED HOW FAR IS THIS GOING TO GO AND WHAT ARE THE NEXT STEPS FOR THE UNITED STATES? THESE TWO COMPANIES HAVE BEEN FEATURED PROMINENTLY BY THE CHINESE AND THEIR EFFORTS TO DRIVE A POTENTIAL ESPIONAGE IN HIS COUNTRY AND INTO THE COUNTRIES OF OUR ALLIES AROUND THE WORLD >> EACH OF THOSE TWO COMPANIES YOU MENTIONED HAS TIES TO THE COMMUNIST PARTY AND CHINESE EFMILITARY

THEY ARE SUBJECT TO CHINA'S NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE LAWS THAT REQUIRES THEM TO SECRETLY COMPLY TO REQUESTS FROM THE COMMUNIST PARTY LOOKING BACKWARDS, WE WANT TO UNDERSTAND IF THERE IS EXISTING NETWORK EQUIPMENT FROM THOSE COMPANIES AND FIGURE OUT HOW TO RIP AND REPLACE IT THIS IS NOT A RISK WE CAN INDULL KNOWLEDGE IN THIS ONE — — INDULGE IN THIS COUNTRY LOU: WE ALSO ARE LOOKING AT A WHOLE GOVERNMENT HERE THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

IS IT A WHOLE GOVERNMENT EFFORT WE ARE WITNESSING OR IS IT SOME HAH AD HOC STILL IN — IS IT SOMEWHATTED A Y NOT MIDST OF PON POLICY CONCERNS ORPARTICULAR HATED BY SECRETARY OF STATE POMPEO RECENTLY IN A SPEECH DECLARING CHINA'S THREATS TO THIS COUNTRY IS SIMPLY UNACCEPTABLE? >> ALL I CAN SPEAK TO IS WHAT THE FFCC BELIEVES CHINA AND THESE TWO COMPANIES PRESENT A SIGNIFICANT RISK TO THE UNITED STATES M OTHER COUNTRIES UNDERSTAND THE RISK EVEN IF THEY HAVEN'T SAID SO PUBLICLY THEY NEED TO EVALUATE THE RISK TO THEIR OWN NATIONAL SECURITY WHEN IT COMES TO INCORPORATING EQUIPMENT FROM UNTRUSTED VENDORS LOU: COMPANIES WE THOUGHT WOULD IN THE LEAD ON 5G, AT&T PRINCIPAL AMONG THEM, HAVEN'T BEEN HITTING THEIR MARKERS

WHAT DOES IT MEAN FOR THE ADAPTATION FOR US TELECOM >> WE HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTING THE 5G FAST PLAN GETTING MORE SPECTRUM INTO THE U

S MARKETPLACE, AND PUTTING TOGETHER THE BUILDING BLOCKS FOR ANY COMPANY TO BE ABLE TO BID AT SPECTRUM AUCTIONS AND DEPLOY THAT INFRASTRUCTURE AT SCALE WENG ARE WORKING WITH ALL THE COMPANIES TO GIVE THEM A FULL AND FAIR CHANCE TO COMPETE WE WANT TO MAKE SURE ALL-AMERICAN COMPANIES CAN DEPLOY 5G HERE IN OUR COUNTRY LOU: ARE YOU CONCERNED ABOUT THE LAG WITH 5G BY AMERICAN COMPANIES? >> WE ARE GETTING INTO THE SMALL CELLMARK THE PLACE AT A QUICK RATE

I AM HOPEFUL THOUGH WE STILL NEED TO MAINTAIN THAT LEAD LOU: FARMING COMMUNITIES THAT ARE DESPERATE FOR LOWER PRICED HUAWEI-ZTE TYPE EQUIPMENT IS IT REPLACEABLE? AND IS THERE A POSSIBILITY — WILBUR ROSS TALKING ON THIS NETWORK THIS WEEK — VERY CONCERNED ABOUT THE UP REPLY CASES FOR THOSE RURAL COMMUNITIES WHO FRANKLY JUST HAVE A DISADVANTAGED POSITION WHEN IT COMES TO TELECOM PERIOD BUT TO 5G IN PARTICULAR >> THAT IS A CONCERN I SHARED AS A RURAL AMERICAN, HAVING GROIN IN RURAL CAN CASS

WE WANT TO MAKE SURE OUR COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS ARE SECURE WE ARE WORKING WITH THE RURAL CARRIERS TO MAKE SURE THEY HAVE A FINANCING MECHANISM IN PLACE MY MESSAGE TO THEM AND ANYBODY IS PRETTY SIMPLE THE ONLY PROBLEM WITH EQUIPMENT FROM CHINA AND HUAWEI AND ZTE COSTS TOO MUCH WE NEED TO MAKE SURE THE RURAL CARRIERS AND ALL OF US ARE ON THE SAME PAGE

LOU: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SAID THIS IN HIS LETTER TO THE FCC THE ATTORNEY GENERALTH WRITING,E SHOULD NOT SIGNAL THAT HUAWEI AND ZTE ARE ANYTHING OTHER THAN A THREATN TO OUR COLLECTIVE SECURITY THEIR OWN TRACK RECORD AS WELL AS THE PRACTICES OF THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT DEMONSTRATE THAT HUAWEI AND ZTE CANNOT BE TRUSTED AND AGAIN, CONGRATULATIONS ON THAT 5-0 VOTE GOOD FOR YOU

GOOD FOR THE COMMISSION >> THANK YOU, SIR LOU: IT'S GOOD FOR THE COUNTRY GOOD TO SEE YOU WE ARE LEARNING MORE ABOUT THE LONG-AWAITED REPORT ON FISA ABUSES BY THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT INSPECTOR GENERAL, MICHAEL HOROWITZ

HE HAS REPORTEDLY FOUND EVIDENCE THAT FORMER FBI ATTORNEY KEVIN CLINESMITH MANIPULATED A KEY DOCUMENT TO JUST YOUIFY SURVEILLANCE OF FORMER TRUMP ADVISOR, CARTER PAGE, THAT IS, FACILITATE SPYING ON A PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE THE "NEW YORK TIMES" REPORTS HOROWITZ WILL LIKELY ABSOLVE TOP-RANKING FBI OFFICIALS FOR ABUSING THEIR POWERS, JAMES COMEY, ANDREW McCABE, PETER STRZOK, AND LISA PAGE WE'LL BE TAKING UP THAT STORY IN GREATER DETAIL AND ASSESSING WHAT THE PROCESS IS FOR THOSE FOLKS THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION ISSUING A NEW WARNING TO LEFT-WING ACTIVIST JOURNALS BLOCKING US

CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT' OFFICERS IN THEIR COURTHOUSES JUDICIAL WATCH'S TOM FITTON JOINS US JOHN BOLTON, THE FORMER NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR USING TWITTER TO TAKE SHOTS AT THE WHITE HOUSE AND THREATEN THE WHITE HOUSE I'LL BE TALKING ABOUT THAT LOU: ON WALL STREET STOCKS CLOSING HIGHER THE DOW UP 109 POINTS, THE S & P UP 7

MARKETS FINISHING LOWER OVERALL, THE DOW DOWN NEARLY HALF A PERCENT ON THE WEEK THE NASDAQ DOWN A QUARTER PERCENT CRUDE OIL FLAT TRADING AT 58 DOLLARS A BARREL SILVER GAINING OVER A QUARTER% A REMIND TORE LISTEN TO MY REPORTS THREE TIMES A DAY COAST TO COAST ON THE SALEM RADIO NETWORK

FORMER NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR JOHN BOLTON IS BACK ON TWITTER AND TAKINGG SHOTS AT THE TRUMP WHITE HOUSE HE TWEETED, SINCE RESIGNING AS NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR, THE @WHITE HOUSE REFUSED TO RETURN ACCESS TO MY PERSONAL TWITTER ACCOUNT TO THOSE WHO SPECULATED I WENT INTO HIDING, I'M SORRY TO DISAPPOINT THE WHITE HOUSE SAYS IT DOESN'T HAVE THE MEANS TO BLOCK HIM FROM HIS ACCOUNT PRESIDENT TRUMP SAYS HE WANTS TO CALL ADAM SCHIFF, HUNTER BIDEN AND THE WHISTLEBLOWER TO TESTIFY IF THE SENATE HOLD AN IMPEACHMENT TRIAL

PRESIDENT TRUMP ARGUING THAT CALLING THESE WITNESSES WILL PROVIDE HIM DUE PROCESS PRESIDENT TRUMP: WE COULDN'T HAVE ANY WITNESSES WE W WANTED TO CALL THE WHISTLEBLOWER YOU KNOW WHO I WANT AS THE FIRST WITNESS? I WANT A TRIAL LOOK, NUMBER ONE, THEY SHOULD NEVER EVER IMPEACH

>> AND OF COURSE THERE SHOULD BE DUE PROCESS FROM THE VERY BEGINNING WHICH THEY HAVE DENIED THIS PRESIDENT AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE JOINING US TONIGHT, WHITE HOUSE PRESS SECRETARY, STEPHANIE GRISHAM THE PRESIDENT STANDING STRAIGHT UP AND SAYING, I THINK HE ALSO LOOKED AT THOSE POLL NUMBERS AND SAW THE WAY THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AREAY REACTING TO THIS CHARADE T ONON BY THE DIMMS HE WANTS TO HAVE A FULL-ON TRIAL AND RAISE A LITTLE HELL, IT APPEARS >> ABSOLUTELY

WHEN YOU HAVE DONE NOTHING WRONG AND YOU HAVE HAD TO ENDURE MONTHS AND MONTHS OF PEOPLE SAYING YOU HAVE DONE HORRIBLE THINGS I THINK ANYBODY WOULD WANT TO DEFEND THEMSELVES I THINK ADAM SCHIFF SHOULD GO UP FIRST HE LIED ABOUT WHAT HE KNOWS ABOUT THIS WHISTLEBLOWER WE KNOW HIS STAFF WAS DEALING WITH THIS WHISTLEBLOWER

A WHISTLEBLOWER WHO TREATED THIS PRESIDENT MUST FOE DOWN THAT'S HORRIBLE I AGREE WITH THE PRESIDENT, LET'S PUT IT OUT THERE THERE IS NOTHING TO HIDE LET'S GO

>> ADAM SCHIFF PUT UP ALL OF THESE SO-CALLED WITNESSES TO SEE TIME AND TIME AGAIN SUGGESTIONS, SPECULATION, PRESUMPTION, ASSUMPTION, HEARSAY SIT BECAME POPE PARADE OF NONSENSE ON IT WAS DIRECTED AT THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATESEN HE HAS THE PATIENCE OF JOBE TO PUT UP WITH THIS NONSENSE >> HE DOES, AND HE CONTINUES TO WORK FOR THE COUNTRY WHICH I ADMIRE SO MUCH BUT YOU ARE RIGHT, I COULDN'T KEEP TRACK OF THE TIMES PRESUMPTION, I THOUGHT, I ASSUMED

THE ONE WITNESS WHO DID SPEAK DIRECTLY TO THE PRESIDENT ALBEIT A FEW TIMES, HE SAID UNEQUIVOCALLY THE PRESIDENT TOLD HIM I DON'T WANT ANYTHING, I DON'T WANT A QUID PRO QUO I WANT ZELENSKY TO DO THE RIGHT THING, I WANT HIM TO DO WHAT HE RAN ON, WHICH IS CORRUPTION TO ME IT SHOULD BE OVER I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY WE ARE CONTINUING TO TALK ABOUT IT LOU: THE REFERENCE TO AMBASSADOR SONDLAND'S TESTIMONY WHICH HE LEFT OUT OF HIS OPENING STATEMENT WHICH THE REPUBLICANS REMINDED HIM OF WHAT HE SAID

THE REPUBLICANS, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, STOOD UP AS I HAVE NEVER SEEN THEM IN MY CAREER SHOULDER TO SHOULDER AND DISMARNTLING EVERY ONE OF THOSE FOLKS WHO TRY TO ASSAULT THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND ALL OF THEM BASELESSLY >> T IT'S BEEN SO AMAZING TO SEE THE H REPUBLICANS SO UNITED THAT'S ONE OF MANY WAYS THIS WILL BACKFIRE ON THE DEMS THE REPUBLICANS ARE SO UNITED BEHIND THE PRESIDENT

THEYOU ARE SEEING WHAT'S BEEN HAPPENING TOND HIM FOR YEARS I WAS JUST HANDED A "VANITY FAIR" ARTICLE SAYING IT LOOKS LIKE THIS WON'T WORK OUT FOR THE DEMS IF WE HAVE GOT THE "VANITY FAIR" MAGAZINE SAYING THE DEMS ARE GOING TO LOSE THIS BATTLE, THAT'S SAYING SOMETHING LOU: AMBASSADOR BOLTON TODAY WITH THIS NONSENSE ABOUT TWITTER WANTING HIS DEDICATED HANDLE, THAT WAS NEVER IN POSSESSION OF THE WHITE HOUSE, WAS IT? >> IT WAS HIS PERSONAL ACCOUNT HE CONTINUED TO USE WHILE HE WAS AT THE WHITE HOUSE I DON'T KNOW A WHOLE LOT BY THE

SOMETIMES I'LL USE MY FATHER AS AN EXAMPLE SOME PEOPLE DON'T UNDERSTAND ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS CONTACT TWITTER AND RESET YOUR PASSWORD IF YOU HAVE FORGOTTEN IT LOU: I'M TRYING TO CALCULATE WHETHER BOLTON OR MYSELF IS THE OLDER FELLA WITH A TWITTER ACCOUNT IT'S A SHAME TO SEE BOLTON BEHAVE LIKE THIS HE WAS NEXT TO THE PRESIDENT, SERVING THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND NOW IS ACTING TO ME LIKE IT'S JUST VERY DISAPPOINTING THAT HE WOULD STOOP TO THE LEVEL HE HAS JUST IN INNUENDO

>> I HEAR HE'S GOT A BOOK DEAL AND HE HAS BEEN ON THE SPEAKER CIRCUIT AND CHARGE SOMETHING SHY FEES FOR THAT SO I GUESS MONEY CAN GET YOU TO DO A LOT OF THINGS LOU: THAT'S A SHAME ESPECIALLY FOR SOMEBODY IN SUCH A HIGH AND S TRUSTED POSITION STEPHANIE CONGRATULATIONS ON ANOTHER TERRIFIC WEEK FOR THE PRESIDENT AND WE LOOK FORWARD TO MANY YEARS MORE

WE WOULD LIKE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS ON ALL OF THIS ON A PROGRAMMING NOTE, INVESTIGATIVE REPORTER JOHN SOLOMON, CONGRESSMAN MARK MEADOWS AND LEE ZELDIN AMONG OUR GUESTS MONDAY EVENING UP NEXT TONIGHT, HOW ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR IS CHARACTERIZING THE SUSPICIOUS DEATH OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN JOHN SOLOMON FIGHTING BACK AGAINST WHAT HAS BEEN A WHOLESALE HIGHLY TARGETED DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN AGAINST HIM DURING THE RADICAL DIMMS IMPEACHMENT FARCE WE'LL HAVE THAT AND MUCH MORE AFTER THIS QUICK BREAK

LOU: OUTRAGEOUS ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR AND ACTING DHS SECRETARY CHAD WOLF TAKING ACTION URGING THE CHIEF JUSTICES TO THE OREGON AND WASHINGTON SUPREME COURTS TO STOP BLOCKING ICE AGENTS FROM DETAINING ILLEGALNI IMMIGRANTS IN THEIR COURTHOUSES THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND WOLF ARGUING THEIR ACTIONS, THOSE JUDGES IN THOSE TWO STATES, POSE AN OUTRIGHT DANGER TO THE PUBLIC

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DESCRIBING EPSTEIN'SCO CELL THE NIGHT HE DIED BRITAIN'S PRINCE ANDREW REPORTEDLY HAS BEEN KICKED OUT OF BUCKINGHAM BALANCE HAS THE MOVE COPS DAYS AFTER THE DUKE OF YORK, THAT'S ANDREW, DEFENDED HIS FRIENDSHIP WITH EPSTEIN DISPUTING BE VINDMAN, SOLOMON REFUTING HIS CLAIMS THAT KEY PARTS OF HIS REPORT WERE INCORRECT SOME MOB IS ASKING WHAT WAS WRONG WITH HIS REPORTING? JOINING US, TOM FITTON, THE ATTACKS ON JOHN SOLOMON ARE EXTRAORDINARY

NO OTHER REPORTER HAS DONE AS MUCH AS SOLOMON TO REVEAL WHAT IS GOING ON IN UKRAINE I MEAN THIS, ACROSS THE BOARD, IN A MY READING OF ALL OF THE COVERAGE, NO ONE HAS SOURCED HIS OR HER WORK EVEN CLOSE TO THE DEGREE THAT JOHN SOLOMON HAS >> BETWEEN VINDMAN AND FIONA HILL, IT'S LIKE LISTENING TO DEMOCRATIC OPERATIVES SPIN INFORMATION SOLOMON HAS THE FACTS ON HIS SIDE ON UKRAINE THE EXPERTS THAT THE PRESIDENT IS SUPPOSED TO BE RELYING ON AS GIVEN TO HIM BY THE DEEP STATE, PEOPLE LIKE HILL AND COLONEL VINDMAN, THEY DON'T KNOW WHAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT

EITHER THEY ARE IGNORE RABBIT OR MENDACIOUS IN SUGGESTING UKRAINE WASN'T WORKING WITH THE OBAMA-CLINTON GANG TO TARGET TRUMP UKRAINIANS WERE DISTRUSTFUL OF TRUMP BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T LIKE HIM NOT WANT TO GO GO TO WAR WITH RUSSIA I DON'T UNDERSTAND IT IT'S EITHER IGNORANT OR THEY ARE MISLEADING ON PURPOSE >> I DON'T KNOW THERE IS A LOT OF QUESTION ABOUT WHICH IT IS

FIONA HILL ACTUALLY SAYING THE REPUBLICANS WERE NOT ACROSS KNOWLEDGING THAT RUSSIA WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR INTERFERING WITH THE US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS IN 2016 THAT WAS NEVER THE ISSUE, NEVER THE CASE, AND THE REPUBLICANS POINTED OUT THAT SHE WAS ABSOLUTELY DEAD WRONG AND THE EXTENT TO WHICH SHE PURSUED THAT UNTRUTH WAS I THOUGHT ASTONISHING

LET'S LISTEN TO FIONA HILL, THE SELF-CAST AT LEAST LEADING EXPERT ON UKRAINE >> I HAVE HEARD SOME OF YOU ON HIS COMMITTEE APPEAR TO BELIEVE THAT RUSSIA AND ITS SECURITY SERVICES DID NOT CONDUCT A CAMPAIGN AGAINST OUR COUNTRY AND PERHAPS SOMEHOW FOR SOME REASON UKRAINE DID THIS IS A FICTIONAL NARRATIVE BEING PERPETRATED AND PROPAGATED BY THE RUSSIAN SECURITY SERVICES THEMSELVES THEOR UNFORTUNATE TRUTH IS RUSSA WAS THE FOREIGN POWER THAT SYSTEMATIC ALL ATTACKED OUR INSTITUTIONS IN 2016 LOU: THE ARROGANCE OF THAT STATEMENT

>>HA WAS THAT JOHN BRENNAN OR FIONA HILL? I CAN'T TELL THE CONTINUES NO ONE IS MAKING THE ARGUMENT THAT THE RUGS WEREN'T PLAYING AROUND IN OUR ELECTIONS THEY SPENT A COUPLE HUNDRED THOUSAND ON FACEBOOK AD THAT'S PRETTY CLEAR NO ONE KNOWS WHETHER THEY WERE DOING IT TO HELP CLINTON OR HELP TRUMP

WERE THE RUSSIANS TONIGHT TO HELP TRUMP OR WERE THEY IN IT TO HELP CLINTON? IT IS THE DOSSIER PEOPLE PUSHING THE LIE OR THE INFORMATION WITHOUT EVIDENCE THAT THE RUSSIANS WERE IN THERE TO HELP TRUMP I'M GLAD SHE IS NO LONGER IN THE WHITE HOUSE LOU: I HOPE' OF THESE PEOPLE WILL NEVER AGAIN BE IN THE WHITE HOUSE >> NO MATTER THE ADMINISTRATION LOU: VINDMAN TALKING ABOUT ZELENSKY BEING ASKED ABOUT WHETHER HE SERVED IN THE MILITARY

HE DIDN'T KNOW THE ANSWER TO IT, AND HE CONSIDERS HIMSELF THE LEADING EXPERT, NOT FIONA HILL NOT TO KNOW THAT, EVEN THOUGH APPARENTLY THE ZELENSKY GOVERNMENT OFFERED HIM THE ROLE OF DEFENSE MINISTER? HE SHOULD KNOW >> AN AMERICAN CITIZEN KNOWS MORE ABOUT UKRAINE AND THEIR TIES TO THE CLINTONS AND THE TRUMP ISSUE THAN THE MEN WHO ADVISE THE PRESIDENT I DON'T KNOW WHY VINDMAN IS IN THE WHITE HOUSE LOU: IT'S DIFFICULT TO COP PREBEHIND WHAT THIS PRESIDENT HAD TO PUT UP WITH

THE ABJECT DISLOYAL I AND SIMPLE HONOR YOU WOULD THINK THAT A PRESIDENT SHOULD EXPECT BETTER >> HE WAS RIGHT TO RELY ON GIULIANI RATHER THAN THOSE TWO LOU: I AM G MICHAEL HOROWITZ IS COMING FORWARD WITH HIS REPORT

THE SUGGESTION IS PERHAPS THERE WILL NOT BE GREAT ACCOUNTABILITY FOR THE TOP LEVEL OF THE FBI AND JUSTICE DEPARTMENT YOUR THOUGHTS? >> I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S SPIN OR NOT BUT IT WOULDN'T SURPRISE ME BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT IGs DO

LOU: HE MAY NOT BE THE ON ONE SPINNING >> THERE ARE COVER-UPS AND EXPOSE'S AT THE SAME TIME THE LAST I AM G REPORT EXPOSED STRZOK AND PAGE HATRED FOR TRUMP AND HE PRETEND IT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THE INVESTIGATION AND THERE WERE CRIMES THAT TOOK PLACE IN THE TARGETING OF TRUMP

BRENNAN IS ATTACKING TRUMP EVERY DAY AND THE IDEA D HE WAS RUNNING TE CIA AND RUNNING INVESTIGATIONS AGAINST HIM THE PRESIDENT NEEDS TO APPOINT A SPECIAL COUNSEL TO GET AT THIS WE CAN'T RELY ON THE CURRENT SYSTEM TO DO IT HE HAS TO BRING IN SOMEONE SEPARATE

LOU: I REMAIN SOMEWHAT OPTIMISTIC >> I'M OUTRAGED BECAUSE UP OPTIMISTIC I EXPECT PEOPLE TO DO THE RIGHT THING AND IT JUST DOESN'T HAPPEN >> LET'S HOPE FOR THAT EXPT BY THE CONGRESS AND THE SENATE AWAITING HIS SIGNATURE JOINING US TONIGHT, DEAN CHANG, DEAN, GOOD TO HAVE YOU WITH US

LET'S START WITH THE LEGISLATION THE HONG KONG HUMAN RIGHTS LEGISLATION PASSED BY BOTH HOUSES BY OVERWHELMING MARGIN YOUR THOUGHTS ON IT AND HOW MUCH OF A COMPLICATING FACTOR THAT IS FOR THE PRESIDENT >> ON THE ONE HAND IT'S UNDOUBTEDLY A COMPLICATED FACTOR IN THE MIDDLE OF TRADE NEGOTIATIONS WE HAVE THIS BILL REGARDING HONG KONG WHICH CLEARLY IS OF CONCERN TO THE CHINESE

THE CHINESE HAVE BEEN SAYING IF YOU SIGN THIS, BAD THINGS WILL HAPPEN FOR THE PRESIDENT, IF HE SIGNS IT, IT DOES CREATE A COMPLY KAIGHT FACTOR FOR TRADE IF HE DOESN'T SEEN IT IT WILL BE PORTRAYED ACROSS THE BOARD CERTAINLY BY THE PRESS AND CONGRESS AS CASING TO THE CHINESE ARE THE CHINESE HOPING THE PRESIDENT DOES SIGN THIS BILL? THE TRADE NEGOTIATIONS DON'T SEEM TO PRODUCE THE RESULTS WE HAVE BEEN HOPING FOR >> IT'S PROBABLY — THIS IS A PRESIDENT COMMITTED TO THOSE TARIFFS AND IT'S UNLIKELY HE WILL ACCEDE TO DEMAND AND CERTAINLY NOT TO THREATS SUGGESTING THERE WILL BE REVENGE TAKEN IF YOU SIGN THIS LEGISLATION ALL BUT ASSURED HIS SIGNATURE ON THAT I WOULD SUSPECT

>> IT WOULD BE THE PERFECT EXCUSE FOR THE CHINESE TO WALK AWAY LOU: THE CHINESE HAVEN'T SHOWN ANY NEED FOR AN EXCUSE THEY RENEGED IN MAY THEY COUNT THE AGREEMENT THEY OSTENSIBLY MADE WITH THE UNITED STATES IN OCTOBER THEY WERE TO SIGN AN AGREEMENT ON NOVEMBER 17

AT APECK WHAT IN THE WORLD WOULD THEY HAVE DONE — WHAT IS THERE TO SIGN, THERE MAY BE TEXTS I AM NOT SUGGESTING THERE ISN'T THERE IS NOT ANY TEXTS THAT WE ARE AWARE OF >> BY CREATING A SITUATION WHERE THEY CAN BLAME THE PRESIDENT, YOU HAVE TO REMEMBER THE CHINESE AREN'T PLAYING TO THEMSELVES THEY ARE PLAYING TO TWO OTHER AUDIENCES

THE AMERICAN AUDIENCE AND THE GLOBAL AUDIENCE AUDIENCES THAT HAVE BEEN PRIMED BY OUR OWN PRESS THAT DONALD TRUMP IS THE BAD GUY HERE DONALD TRUMP HAS CREATED A SITUATION WHICH FORCES CHINA TO WALK AWAY FROM THEM LOU: TROUBLING TO ME, THAT THERE HAVE BEEN CONTINUING EFFORTS BY WALL STREET, THE DONOR CLASS AND MAJOR BUSINESS INTERESTS IN THIS COUNTRY TO UNDERCUT THE PRESIDENT AND HIS TRADE PLANS, HIS PLANS AND STRATEGY TO BALANCE TRADE AND PRESERVE THOSE TARIFFS I MEAN, THAT'S DEEPLY TROUBLING THAT WE HAVE A BUSINESS COMMUNITIES COMMITTED TO THE CHINESE STRATAGEM AND POSITIONS RATHER THAN TO THE U

S PRESIDENT >>EN WALL STREET, I WOULD SUGGE, IS DOING WHAT IS IN ITS FIDUCIARY INTERESTS AND RESPONSIBILITY MAXIMIZING SHAREHOLDER RETURN BASED ON A QUARTERLY — LOU: THEY HAVE OTHER RESPONSIBILITIES, THEY HAVE RESPONSIBILITIES TO THE NATION THEY HAVE RESPONSIBILITIES TO THIS GOVERNMENT

BY THE WAY, THEY ARE AMERICAN COMPANIES, AND WE KNOW GOOGLE IS CREATING SEARCH THAT IS DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY FOR CHINA WE KNOW WHAT BIG TECH IS DOING THERE ON DECEMBER 1, THE ABILITY OF THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT TO JUST IN ONE SWOOP SCOOP UP ALL OF THE DATA FOR US COMPANIES DOINGNG BUSINESS IN CHINA AND THESE COMPANIES HAVE NO DEFENSE AGAINST IT WHAT ARE WE DOING? WE ARE NOT ASSURING PRIVACY

WE ARE NOT ASSURING THE RIGHTS OF AMERICAN CITIZENS ARE OUR OWN VALUES >> THE COMPANIES HAVE LITTLE ORE LIMITED FINANCIAL INTEREST IN KEEPING DATA PRIVATE LOU: GIVE THEM SOME DAMN REASON REGULATE THE HELL OUT OF THEM >> HOLD ON A SEC HERE

>> NO, I'M NOT GOING TO HOLD ON WE'LL REGULATE THEM >> I THINK ELIZABETH WARREN WOULD BE DELIGHTED TO REGULATE FACEBOOK I THINKEB HALF OF THE DEMOCRATIC LINE UP* LOU: THIS PRESIDENT BEFORE ELIZABETH WARREN HAD ANY IDEA WHERE SHE WAS GOING TO COME DOWN ON A HOST OF ISSUES WAS TALKING ABOUT THE NATURAL IMPORTANCE AND IMPERATIVE OF STOPPING MONOPOLISTIC BEHAVIOR BY BIG TECH IN SILICON VALLEY

THAT'S HIS ISSUE THAT'S HIS CONCERN THAT HE ARTICULATED FIRST THIS ISN'T ABOUT ELIZABETH WARREN >> IT'S NOT ABOUT ELIZABETH WARREN BUT THE QUESTION YOU HAVE TO ASK IS, IS REGULATION THE RIGHT APPROACH TO ENCOURAGE COMPETITION? >> I SEE ONLY ONE OTHER ALTERNATIVE THAT'S TO ALLOW THE CHINESE TO PREVAIL

THEIR VALUES WILL BE OURS CORPORATE AMERICA DECIDED SOMEHOW ITS FIDUCIARY RESPONSIBILITY TO RELATIONSHIP, PILLAGE — TO RAPE, PILLAGE AND PLUNDER >> YOU RELEASE THE POTENTIAL OF A LOT OF MISCHIEF — LOU: WHAT COULD BE MORE MISCHIEF THAN THE UNITED STATES LOSING ITS IDENTITY, VALUES, AND STANDING BEFORE THE GLOBE AND NOT STANDING UP FOR ITS OWN VALUES, FREEDOM, INDEPENDENCE, LIBERTY, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND SUDDENLY BECAUSE SOME FOOL THINGS WE SHOULDN'T REGULATE, WE SIMPLY ALLOWY THIS COUNTRY TO BE CONSUMED, SUBSUMED BY THE CHINESE? >> THE PARTY THAT SUPPORTS REGULATION THE MOST IS I WOULD SUGGEST TO YOU OFTEN PROPOUNDING AN AWFUL LOT OF VALUES THAT SOMETIMES FLY IN THE FACE OF A LOT OF THINGS THAT — LOU: YOU COULDN'T BE MORE ABSTRACT OR PERHAPS I COULDN'T BE MORE OBTUSE I CAN'T FIND MEANING IN THE WORDS YOU JUST USED I'M TALKING ABOUT INDEPENDENCE

I'M TALKING ABOUT LIBERTY, PERSONAL FREEDOM, HUMAN RIGHTS WHERE DO YOU FIND THOSE IN CHINA >> I AM NOT SAYING CHINA LOU: THAT'S THE CONTEST IT'S BETWEEN CHINA AND THE UNITED STATES

>> WHEN W YOU ALLOW COMPANIES, WHEN YOU FORCE COMPANIES — LOU: FIRST OF ALL, THERE IS THIS SORT OF — THERE IS THIS VIEW THAT CORPORATIONS ARE CITIZENS, RIGHT? AREN'T THEY LEGALLY? >> DEPEND LOU: THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF SPEECH >> THEY DO LOU: BUT THEY DON'T HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY TO THE NATION THAT MAKES THOSE RIGHTS VIVID AND MAKES THOSE VALUES INDELIBLY CRITICAL TO THE NATION? >> I DON'T REMEMBER THE LAST TIME WE ACTUALLY LITERALLY DRAFTED A CORPORATION CORPORATIONS HELP — LOU: IN THAT CASE WHAT ARE WE TO DO WITH THEM

I'M NOT READY TO SAY CORPORATE AMERICA IS OUR MASTERS AND I'M NOT WILLING TO SAY OUR VALUES DON'T MATTER IN SOME SORT OF LIBERTARIAN VIEW >> I'M HARDY SAYING VALUES DON'T MATTER AND COMPANIES DON'T HAVE RESPONSIBILITIES WHAT I AM SAYING IS — LOU: VIS-A-VIS THE CHINESE YOU ARE GOING TO PICK A WINNER

YOU TELL ME HOW W WANT >> I WANT THE COMPANY THAT'S MOST EFFICIENT LOU: LET'S LEAVE THE COMPANY OUT OF IT >> THAT'S NOT EVEN A QUESTION IT'S THE UNITED STATES

LOU: HOW ARE YOU GOING TO ASSURE THAT IF YOU WON'T DEFEND OUR VALUES >> OUR VALUES HAVE TO INCLUDE ASPECTS OF HUMAN FREEDOM LOU: NO ONE HAS DONE MORE ON REGULATION THAN DONALD TRUMP BUT YOU WOULD OPPOSE REGULATING COMPANIES THAT WILL PUT PROFIT AHEAD OF THE NATIONAL INTERESTS >> PROFIT AND NATIONAL INTERESTS ARE NOT CONTRADICTORY

LOU: WE DON'T NEED TRAINING WHEELS FOR THE CEOs RUNNING WALL STREETT FIRMS MEANWHILE WE'LL HAVE TO WRAP THIS UP DEAN >> LOU, THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME LOU: GREAT TO HAVE YOU HERE

TESLA UNVEILING ITS NEW ELECTRIC PICKUP TRUCK IN CALIFORNIA BUT A TEST OF ITS SO-CALLED UNBREAKABLE WINDOWS DIDN'T GO EXACTLY AS ELON MUSK PLANNED HERE WE GO >> WELL, MAYBE THAT WAS A LITTLE TOO HARD LOU: ELON MUSK HAD HIS HEAD OF DESIGN THROW ANOTHER — IT BROKE AGAIN, PROMISING IT WOULD BE BULLETPROOF

IT DIDN'T WORK OUT THAT WAY AND THE STOCK IS — DIDN'T EXACTLY GO THROUGH THE ROOF EITHER PRESIDENT TRUMP SEES A BUMP IN THE POLLS AMERICA'S APPETITE FOR IMPEACHMENT DECLINING THE PRESIDENT CLEARLY THE WINNER OF THIS IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY

STAY WITH US LOU: JOINING US TONIGHT, SARA CARTER, CHARLIE HURT, WASHINGTON TIMES OPINION EDITOR, GREAT TO HAVE YOU BOTH HERE THE IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY SO STYLED BY ADAM SCHIFF AND SPEAKER PELOSI, HOW DID IT GO FOR THE DIFFICULTIES? >> I THINK PRETTY MUCH IT FELLN IN THEIR FACE THEY DIDN'T HAVE ANY EVIDENCE THEY PRESENTED A CASE BEFORE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE BASED ON HEARSAY AND PRESUMPTIONS

THAT WAS A WORD USED BY GORDON SONDLAND THEMSELVES THEY DIDN'T HAVE ANYTHING TO PROVE, A QUID PRO QUO PORE MILITARY AID EVEN MORE DAMAGING IS PRESIDENT TRUMP SUPPLIED THE UKRAINIANS WITH LETHAL AID, SOMETHING OBAMA NEVER DID, WITH THE JAVELIN MISSILES AND HUMVEES OTHER NECESSARY EQUIPMENT THEY SAID THEY NEED LOU: I THINK THE REASON THE DEMOCRATS — THERE ARE SEVERAL REASONS

BUT CHIEF AMONG THEM IS WHAT YOU ARE ALLUDING TO IT'S NOT WHAT HE SAID IT'S THE FACT THAT THIS PRESIDENT HAS DONE MORE THAN ANY OTHER PRESIDENT IN MODERN HISTORY IN HIS FIRST THREE YEARS, AND IT SCARES THE HELL OUT OF THEM >> AND THEY ARE DESPERATE NOT TO HAVE A CAMPAIGN BASED ON ISSUES BECAUSE THE PRESIDENT WILL BEAT THEM ON ISSUES DURING THE HEARINGS, THE MORE THEY USE GIRLY WORDS LIKE QUID QPRO QUO OR OBSTRUCTION OR THE WITNESS TAMPERING

ALL OF THESE SQUIRMY WORDS MY FAVORITE ONE THOUGH IS WHEN ADAM SCHIFF IN ALL SERIOUSNESS LOOKED AT SONDLAND AND SAID, YOU WOULD ABOUT THIS CONTINUUM OF INSIDIOUSNESS, AND THEY STARTED TALKING ABOUT THIS CONTINUUM LOU: THEY HAVE AN AFFECTION FOR I LATIN OR LATIN DERIVATIVES IF YOU CANNOT EXPLAIN IT IN CLEAR TERMS THAT AN 8-YEAR-OLD CAN UNDERSTAND, THEN YOU PROBABLY DON'T HAVE A CASE >> THEY JUST SIMPLY DON'T HAVE A CASE

YOU CAN HEAR PEOPLE'S FEELING IN ANY ADMINISTRATION PEOPLE WILL BE BANTERING BACK AND FORTH OVER FOREIGN POLICY WHETHER THEY AGREE OR DISAGREE BUT HE'S THE COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF LOU: HAS GEORGE W BUSH USED TO SAY, THE DECIDER-IN-CHIEF

WE'LL BE RIGHT BACK STAY WITH US LOU: WE ARE BACK WITH SARA CARTER AND CHARLIE HURT THE PRESIDENT STRONGER OR WEAKER OUT OF THIS? POLLS SAY STRONGER AND IMPEACHMENT LESS ASSURED CERTAINLY

>> I THINK JUST LOOK AT THE RATINGS THEY GOT ON TELEVISION THE IMPEACHMENT RATINGS ON TELEVISION I THINK HE'S IN A MUCH STRONGER POSITION WE KNOW EXACTLY WHY NANCY PELOSI DID NOT WANT TO GO DOWN THIS RABBIT HOLE LOU: AOC AND NADLER

>> GREED FOR POWER IS WHY SHE DID IT SHE DIDN'T WANT TO LOSE THE SPEAKERSHIP >> I HAVE TO AGREE WITH CHARLIE NANCY PELOSI DID NOT WANT TO GO DOWN THIS ROAD AT ALL AND YOU KNOW, THE PRESSURE ADAM SCHIFF AND THE OTH

Source: Youtube

This div height required for enabling the sticky sidebar