Hit enter after type your search item
Wzy Word

HERE ARE THE WORLD'S NEWS

Liz Cheney: Voting To Impeach Trump Will 'Permanently Damage Our Republic' | NBC News

/
/
/
702 Views
img

CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM MADAM SPEAKER DEFENDED BY OUR MEN AND WOMEN MADAM SPEAKER DEFENDED BY OUR MEN AND WOMEN IN UNIFORM THAT BY OUR MEN AND WOMEN IN UNIFORM THAT SAFEGUARD THAT FREEDOM IN UNIFORM THAT SAFEGUARD THAT FREEDOM FOR 230 YEARS SAFEGUARD THAT FREEDOM FOR 230 YEARS

EACH ONE OF US IN THIS FOR 230 YEARS EACH ONE OF US IN THIS CHAMBER BEARS A SACRED EACH ONE OF US IN THIS CHAMBER BEARS A SACRED DUTY PASSED DOWN AGAIN CHAMBER BEARS A SACRED DUTY PASSED DOWN AGAIN GENERATIONS TO DUTY PASSED DOWN AGAIN GENERATIONS TO PRESERVE AND PROTECT GENERATIONS TO PRESERVE AND PROTECT OUR CONSTITUTION PRESERVE AND PROTECT OUR CONSTITUTION MADAM SPEAKER, OUR OUR CONSTITUTION MADAM SPEAKER, OUR NATION’S FRAMERS MADAM SPEAKER, OUR NATION’S FRAMERS RECOGNIZED THIS NATION’S FRAMERS RECOGNIZED THIS REPUBLIC IS FRAGILE RECOGNIZED THIS REPUBLIC IS FRAGILE AND THAT EXTREME REPUBLIC IS FRAGILE AND THAT EXTREME PARTISANSHIP CAN BE AND THAT EXTREME PARTISANSHIP CAN BE AMONG THE MOST SEVERE PARTISANSHIP CAN BE AMONG THE MOST SEVERE THREATS TO ITS AMONG THE MOST SEVERE THREATS TO ITS SURVIVAL

THREATS TO ITS SURVIVAL THAT IS WHY IN FEDERAL SURVIVAL THAT IS WHY IN FEDERAL 65 ALEXER HAMILTON THAT IS WHY IN FEDERAL 65 ALEXER HAMILTON SAID THE IMPEACHMENT 65 ALEXER HAMILTON SAID THE IMPEACHMENT DECISION WILL BE SAID THE IMPEACHMENT DECISION WILL BE REGULATED MORE BY THE DECISION WILL BE REGULATED MORE BY THE COMPARATIVE STRENGTH REGULATED MORE BY THE COMPARATIVE STRENGTH OF PARTIES THAN BY COMPARATIVE STRENGTH OF PARTIES THAN BY REAL DEMONSTRATIONS OF OF PARTIES THAN BY REAL DEMONSTRATIONS OF INNOCENCE OR GUILT REAL DEMONSTRATIONS OF INNOCENCE OR GUILT HERE MADAM SPEAKER, INNOCENCE OR GUILT

HERE MADAM SPEAKER, OUR DEMOCRATIC HERE MADAM SPEAKER, OUR DEMOCRATIC COLLEAGUES HAVE BEEN OUR DEMOCRATIC COLLEAGUES HAVE BEEN WORKING TO REMOVE THIS COLLEAGUES HAVE BEEN WORKING TO REMOVE THIS PRESIDENT SINCE THE WORKING TO REMOVE THIS PRESIDENT SINCE THE DAY HE WAS ELECTED PRESIDENT SINCE THE DAY HE WAS ELECTED SEARCHING FOR AN DAY HE WAS ELECTED SEARCHING FOR AN OFFENSE ON WHICH THEY SEARCHING FOR AN OFFENSE ON WHICH THEY COULD IMPEACH OFFENSE ON WHICH THEY COULD IMPEACH FAILING TO FIND ONE COULD IMPEACH FAILING TO FIND ONE MADAM SPEAKER THEY FAILING TO FIND ONE MADAM SPEAKER THEY HAVE DECIDED TO ASSUME MADAM SPEAKER THEY HAVE DECIDED TO ASSUME ONE RATHER THAN HAVE DECIDED TO ASSUME ONE RATHER THAN ATTEMPTING TO ENFORCE ONE RATHER THAN ATTEMPTING TO ENFORCE THEIR SUBPOENAS THAT ATTEMPTING TO ENFORCE THEIR SUBPOENAS THAT IN COURT, THEY HAVE THEIR SUBPOENAS THAT IN COURT, THEY HAVE ALSO DECIDED TO IN COURT, THEY HAVE ALSO DECIDED TO DECLARE IT A HIGH ALSO DECIDED TO DECLARE IT A HIGH CRIME AND MISDEMEANOR DECLARE IT A HIGH CRIME AND MISDEMEANOR WHEN THE PRESIDENT OF CRIME AND MISDEMEANOR WHEN THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES WHEN THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES ASSERTS HIS THE UNITED STATES ASSERTS HIS CONSTITUTIONAL ASSERTS HIS CONSTITUTIONAL PRIVILEGES CONSTITUTIONAL PRIVILEGES

THE DEMOCRATS ARE PRIVILEGES THE DEMOCRATS ARE ASKING MEMBERS OF THIS THE DEMOCRATS ARE ASKING MEMBERS OF THIS BODY TO IMPEACH ASKING MEMBERS OF THIS BODY TO IMPEACH DESPITE THE FACT THEY BODY TO IMPEACH DESPITE THE FACT THEY HAVE PRESENTED NO DESPITE THE FACT THEY HAVE PRESENTED NO DIRECT EVIDENCE OF ANY HAVE PRESENTED NO DIRECT EVIDENCE OF ANY IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE DIRECT EVIDENCE OF ANY IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE LET ME SAY IT ONE MORE IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE LET ME SAY IT ONE MORE TIME MADAM SPEAKER, LET ME SAY IT ONE MORE TIME MADAM SPEAKER, THEY HAVE PRESENTED NO TIME MADAM SPEAKER, THEY HAVE PRESENTED NO DIRECT EVIDENCE OF ANY THEY HAVE PRESENTED NO DIRECT EVIDENCE OF ANY IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE

DIRECT EVIDENCE OF ANY IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE IF ANYONE IN THIS IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE IF ANYONE IN THIS CHAMBER STILL BELIEVES IF ANYONE IN THIS CHAMBER STILL BELIEVES DEMOCRATS HAVE PROVEN CHAMBER STILL BELIEVES DEMOCRATS HAVE PROVEN THEIR CASE, I WOULD DEMOCRATS HAVE PROVEN THEIR CASE, I WOULD URGE THOSE MEMBERS TO THEIR CASE, I WOULD URGE THOSE MEMBERS TO ASK THE CHAIRMAN OF URGE THOSE MEMBERS TO ASK THE CHAIRMAN OF THE INTELLIGENCE COME ASK THE CHAIRMAN OF THE INTELLIGENCE COME HIT THE INTELLIGENCE COME HIT — COMMITTEE MR HIT — COMMITTEE MR SCHIFF WHY HE APPEARED — COMMITTEE MR

SCHIFF WHY HE APPEARED TO ANSWER QUESTIONS SCHIFF WHY HE APPEARED TO ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT HIS REPORT TO ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT HIS REPORT BEFORE MEMBERS VOTE ABOUT HIS REPORT BEFORE MEMBERS VOTE FOR IMPEACHMENT, THEY BEFORE MEMBERS VOTE FOR IMPEACHMENT, THEY MIGHT WANT TO KNOW WHY FOR IMPEACHMENT, THEY MIGHT WANT TO KNOW WHY THE AUTHOR OF THE MIGHT WANT TO KNOW WHY THE AUTHOR OF THE IMPEACHMENT REPORT THE AUTHOR OF THE IMPEACHMENT REPORT WILL NOT DEFEND IT IMPEACHMENT REPORT WILL NOT DEFEND IT UNDER QUESTIONING WILL NOT DEFEND IT UNDER QUESTIONING IF THE HOUSE IMPEACHES UNDER QUESTIONING IF THE HOUSE IMPEACHES HERE, MADAM SPEAKER, IF THE HOUSE IMPEACHES HERE, MADAM SPEAKER, IT WILL CREATE EXACTLY HERE, MADAM SPEAKER, IT WILL CREATE EXACTLY THE TYPE OF RISK THE IT WILL CREATE EXACTLY THE TYPE OF RISK THE FRAMERS CAUTIONED US THE TYPE OF RISK THE FRAMERS CAUTIONED US TO AVOID FRAMERS CAUTIONED US TO AVOID

IT WILL MEAN THAT TO AVOID IT WILL MEAN THAT DIVIDED GOVERNMENT CAN IT WILL MEAN THAT DIVIDED GOVERNMENT CAN IMPERIL A DIVIDED GOVERNMENT CAN IMPERIL A DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED IMPERIL A DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED PRESIDENT BASED ON DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED PRESIDENT BASED ON UNPROVEN ALLEGATIONS PRESIDENT BASED ON UNPROVEN ALLEGATIONS AND ABSENCE OF DIRECT UNPROVEN ALLEGATIONS AND ABSENCE OF DIRECT TESTIMONY DESPITE ALL AND ABSENCE OF DIRECT TESTIMONY DESPITE ALL THE RHETORIC YOU’VE TESTIMONY DESPITE ALL THE RHETORIC YOU’VE HEARD TODAY, MADAM THE RHETORIC YOU’VE HEARD TODAY, MADAM SPEAKER, PASSAGE OF HEARD TODAY, MADAM SPEAKER, PASSAGE OF THESE ARTICLES OF SPEAKER, PASSAGE OF THESE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT MAY THESE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT MAY PERMANENTLY DAMAGE OUR IMPEACHMENT MAY PERMANENTLY DAMAGE OUR REPUBLIC PERMANENTLY DAMAGE OUR REPUBLIC FROM THIS DAY FORWARD, REPUBLIC FROM THIS DAY FORWARD, A HYPER PARTISAN BARE FROM THIS DAY FORWARD, A HYPER PARTISAN BARE MAJORITY CAN SITE THIS A HYPER PARTISAN BARE MAJORITY CAN SITE THIS PRECEDENT TO TRY TO MAJORITY CAN SITE THIS PRECEDENT TO TRY TO REMOVE A FUTURE PRECEDENT TO TRY TO REMOVE A FUTURE COMMANDER IN CHIEF

REMOVE A FUTURE COMMANDER IN CHIEF I URGE MY COLLEAGUES COMMANDER IN CHIEF I URGE MY COLLEAGUES ON BOTH SIDES OF THE I URGE MY COLLEAGUES ON BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE,MADAM SPEAKER, ON BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE,MADAM SPEAKER, THINK OF OUR REPUBLIC, AISLE,MADAM SPEAKER, THINK OF OUR REPUBLIC, THINK OF THE THINK OF OUR REPUBLIC, THINK OF THE CONSTITUTION, THINK OF THINK OF THE CONSTITUTION, THINK OF THE OATH THAT WE ALL CONSTITUTION, THINK OF THE OATH THAT WE ALL SORE TO PROTECT AND THE OATH THAT WE ALL SORE TO PROTECT AND DEFEND THAT SORE TO PROTECT AND DEFEND THAT CONSTITUTION AND VOTE

Source: Youtube

This div height required for enabling the sticky sidebar