Hit enter after type your search item
Wzy Word

HERE ARE THE WORLD'S NEWS

Breaking: Key Trump Admin Aide Will Detail Ukraine Plot To Impeachment Probe | MSNBC

/
/
/
675 Views
img

>>> BREAKING NEWS ON IMPEACHMENT >>> BREAKING NEWS ON IMPEACHMENT COMES OUT RIGHT NOW FROM COMES OUT RIGHT NOW FROM "WASHINGTON POST" "WASHINGTON POST" MARK SANDY IS GOING TO BREAK MARK SANDY IS GOING TO BREAK WITH THE WHITE HOUSE AND IS NOW WITH THE WHITE HOUSE AND IS NOW EXPECTED TO FORMALLY TESTIFY IN EXPECTED TO FORMALLY TESTIFY IN WEEKEND DEPOSITIONS WEEKEND DEPOSITIONS THIS WOULD BE THE FIRST BUDGET THIS WOULD BE THE FIRST BUDGET OFFICIAL TO COOPERATE WITH THE OFFICIAL TO COOPERATE WITH THE IMPEACHMENT PROBE

IMPEACHMENT PROBE AND THE"THE WASHINGTON POST" IN AND THE"THE WASHINGTON POST" IN NEW REPORT NOTES SOMETHING VERY NEW REPORT NOTES SOMETHING VERY INTERESTING INTERESTING IT IS THIS PERSON’S SIGNATURE IT IS THIS PERSON’S SIGNATURE THAT APPEARS ON THE FORMAL THAT APPEARS ON THE FORMAL LETTERS THAT DEALT WITH THE LETTERS THAT DEALT WITH THE DELAY OF THE MONEY GOING TO DELAY OF THE MONEY GOING TO UKRAINE UKRAINE

FEDERAL PROSECUTOR GLEN KERR FEDERAL PROSECUTOR GLEN KERR KERRSHNER KERRSHNER WHEN YOU LOOK AT THIS WHEN YOU LOOK AT THIS INDIVIDUAL, HOW IMPORTANT ARE INDIVIDUAL, HOW IMPORTANT ARE THEY AS IMPORTANT AS HAVING THEY AS IMPORTANT AS HAVING INSTRUMENTS AND EXECUTION OF INSTRUMENTS AND EXECUTION OF DELAYING THE MONEY? DELAYING THE MONEY? >> IF I AM MARK SANDY, A >> IF I AM MARK SANDY, A TEN-YEAR OMB EMPLOYEE WHO HAS TEN-YEAR OMB EMPLOYEE WHO HAS WORKED UNDER REPUBLICAN AND WORKED UNDER REPUBLICAN AND DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTS, I AM DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTS, I AM LOOKING DOWN THE STREET TO SEE LOOKING DOWN THE STREET TO SEE IF THE BUS IS HEADED MY WAY IF THE BUS IS HEADED MY WAY UNDER WHICH I WILL BE THROWN UNDER WHICH I WILL BE THROWN BECAUSE AS "THE WASHINGTON POST" BECAUSE AS "THE WASHINGTON POST" JUST REPORTED AS YOU INDICATED, JUST REPORTED AS YOU INDICATED, SANDY’S SIGNATURE APPEARS ON ONE SANDY’S SIGNATURE APPEARS ON ONE OF THE, WHAT THEY CALL, A OF THE, WHAT THEY CALL, A PORTIONMENT LETTERS WHICH IS PORTIONMENT LETTERS WHICH IS BASICALLY ONE OF THE LETTERS BASICALLY ONE OF THE LETTERS DESIGNED TO PUT A HOLD ON THE DESIGNED TO PUT A HOLD ON THE MONEY THAT CONGRESS HAD MONEY THAT CONGRESS HAD DESIGNATED TO GO TO UKRAINE FOR DESIGNATED TO GO TO UKRAINE FOR ITS OWN PROTECTION AGAINST ITS OWN PROTECTION AGAINST RUSSIAN AGGRESSION RUSSIAN AGGRESSION SO, IF I AM — GO AHEAD

SO, IF I AM — GO AHEAD >> I WAS GOING TO SAY SO THIS IS >> I WAS GOING TO SAY SO THIS IS KEY KEY THIS IS THE CASH FOR THE THING THIS IS THE CASH FOR THE THING TRUMP WANTED TRUMP WANTED

THIS IS WHAT WE OPEN THE SHOW THIS IS WHAT WE OPEN THE SHOW WITH SPEAKER PELOSI FOR THE WITH SPEAKER PELOSI FOR THE FIRST TIME MAKING THE CASE THAT FIRST TIME MAKING THE CASE THAT THE WHOLE POINT OF THIS, SHE THE WHOLE POINT OF THIS, SHE SAID, QUOTE, THAT’S BRIBERY, SAID, QUOTE, THAT’S BRIBERY, BECAUSE IT SHE SAYS BECAUSE IT SHE SAYS QUOTE THAT’S BRIBERY BECAUSE QUOTE THAT’S BRIBERY BECAUSE IT’S MONEY IN RETURN FOR IT’S MONEY IN RETURN FOR ELECTION HELP ELECTION HELP AND THE CONGRESS IS GOING TO AND THE CONGRESS IS GOING TO HAVE THE PERSON WHO ACTUALLY HAD HAVE THE PERSON WHO ACTUALLY HAD THEIR HAND ON THE MONEY THEIR HAND ON THE MONEY >> AND THE QUESTION HAS GOT TO >> AND THE QUESTION HAS GOT TO BE, MR

SANDY, WHO WAS IT THAT BE, MR SANDY, WHO WAS IT THAT AUTHORIZED YOU OR DIRECTED YOU AUTHORIZED YOU OR DIRECTED YOU TO SIGN THAT LETTER PUTTING A TO SIGN THAT LETTER PUTTING A HOLD ON THOSE FUNDS THAT WERE HOLD ON THOSE FUNDS THAT WERE SUPPOSED TO GO TO UKRAINE WHILE SUPPOSED TO GO TO UKRAINE WHILE FRANKLY UKRAINIAN SOLDIERS DIED FRANKLY UKRAINIAN SOLDIERS DIED AS A RESULT OF RUSSIAN AS A RESULT OF RUSSIAN AGGRESSION AGGRESSION I’M QUITE SURE MR SANDY, WHO I’M QUITE SURE MR

SANDY, WHO SOUNDS LIKE A LOW LEVEL SOUNDS LIKE A LOW LEVEL BUREAUCRAT, DIDN’T MAKE THIS BUREAUCRAT, DIDN’T MAKE THIS DECISION ON HIS OWN DECISION ON HIS OWN MADE HE EVEN MADE IT IN PROTEST MADE HE EVEN MADE IT IN PROTEST WE’LL HAVE TO SEE

WE’LL HAVE TO SEE BUT THIS IS THE MONEY PIECE OF BUT THIS IS THE MONEY PIECE OF THE BRIBERY SCHEME THAT YOU’VE THE BRIBERY SCHEME THAT YOU’VE BEEN TALKING SO MUCH ABOUT BEEN TALKING SO MUCH ABOUT AND IT COULD BE A REALLY AND IT COULD BE A REALLY IMPORTANT PIECE IMPORTANT PIECE

>> WELL, YOU REFERENCED >> WELL, YOU REFERENCED BUREAUCRATS BUREAUCRATS THERE HAS BEEN SOME DERIDING OF THERE HAS BEEN SOME DERIDING OF DIFFERENT PEOPLE FROM WHERE THEY DIFFERENT PEOPLE FROM WHERE THEY SIT IN THE CHART SIT IN THE CHART MR

LIMBAUGH CALLED SOME OF MR LIMBAUGH CALLED SOME OF THEM, QUOTE, PROFESSIONAL NERDS THEM, QUOTE, PROFESSIONAL NERDS THE PROBLEM WITH THAT IS THESE THE PROBLEM WITH THAT IS THESE BUREAUCRATS, THESE NERDS, THESE BUREAUCRATS, THESE NERDS, THESE INDIVIDUALS, THEY ARE THE PEOPLE INDIVIDUALS, THEY ARE THE PEOPLE WHO MAKE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WHO MAKE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT RUN RUN

THEY ARE THE PEOPLE WHO GET THE THEY ARE THE PEOPLE WHO GET THE MONEY OUT, WHO GET THE WORK MONEY OUT, WHO GET THE WORK DONE, WHO BACK UP THE PENTAGON DONE, WHO BACK UP THE PENTAGON AND THE DIPLOMATS AND ALL THAT AND THE DIPLOMATS AND ALL THAT STUFF STUFF AND SO WHAT HAPPENS IF THIS AND SO WHAT HAPPENS IF THIS PERSON GOES INTO CONGRESS AND PERSON GOES INTO CONGRESS AND SAYS — SAY THEY CONFIRM THE SAYS — SAY THEY CONFIRM THE FACT THE MUNPY WAS HELD UP WHICH FACT THE MUNPY WAS HELD UP WHICH WOULD GO TO THE EXECUTING OF THE WOULD GO TO THE EXECUTING OF THE PLOT BUT THEY DON’T KNOW WHY PLOT BUT THEY DON’T KNOW WHY YOU CAN’T IMAGINE TRUMP OR YOU CAN’T IMAGINE TRUMP OR MULVANEY WOULD PROBABLY BRIEF MULVANEY WOULD PROBABLY BRIEF THIS BUREAUCRAT ON THE THIS BUREAUCRAT ON THE REASONING

REASONING >> HE MAY NOT KNOW TO THE TOP OF >> HE MAY NOT KNOW TO THE TOP OF THE FOOD CHAIN, BUT YOU CAN BET THE FOOD CHAIN, BUT YOU CAN BET HE’S GOING TO BE ABLE TO TELL HE’S GOING TO BE ABLE TO TELL CONGRESS WHO WAS IT THAT CONGRESS WHO WAS IT THAT PROVIDED YOU THIS APPORTIONMENT PROVIDED YOU THIS APPORTIONMENT LETTER LETTER WHO WAS IT THAT DIRECTED YOU TO WHO WAS IT THAT DIRECTED YOU TO SIGN IT, AND DID THEY PROVIDE SIGN IT, AND DID THEY PROVIDE YOU A REASON AS TO WHY ALL OF A YOU A REASON AS TO WHY ALL OF A SUDDEN $400 MILLION APPROPRIATED SUDDEN $400 MILLION APPROPRIATED BY CONGRESS IS BEING HELD UP? BY CONGRESS IS BEING HELD UP? I PREDICT MR SANDY EVEN THOUGH I PREDICT MR

SANDY EVEN THOUGH HE HAS SERVED UNDER BOTH HE HAS SERVED UNDER BOTH REPUBLICAN AND DEMOCRATIC REPUBLICAN AND DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTS, AS OF TOMORROW WE PRESIDENTS, AS OF TOMORROW WE WILL HEAR THE PRESIDENT CALLING WILL HEAR THE PRESIDENT CALLING HIM A NEVER-TRUMPER HIM A NEVER-TRUMPER >> WELL, MY LEST QUESTION TO YOU >> WELL, MY LEST QUESTION TO YOU IS WE DID A FACT CHECK EARLIER IS WE DID A FACT CHECK EARLIER ON WHY OBVIOUSLY ATTEMPTED ON WHY OBVIOUSLY ATTEMPTED CRIMES ARE STILL CRIMES CRIMES ARE STILL CRIMES BUT PUTTING THAT LEGAL FRAME BUT PUTTING THAT LEGAL FRAME ASIDE, IF THIS INDIVIDUAL SAYS ASIDE, IF THIS INDIVIDUAL SAYS THERE WAS AN UNUSUAL AND THERE WAS AN UNUSUAL AND SPECIFIC FREEZING OF THE MONEY, SPECIFIC FREEZING OF THE MONEY, DOES THAT MAKE IT WORSE BECAUSE DOES THAT MAKE IT WORSE BECAUSE IT SHOWS THEY ACTUALLY WERE IT SHOWS THEY ACTUALLY WERE DOING THIS PLOT, THEY WEREN’T DOING THIS PLOT, THEY WEREN’T JUST DISCUSSING IT? JUST DISCUSSING IT? >> YEAH, THE PLOT REALLY DID >> YEAH, THE PLOT REALLY DID COME TO FRUITION, AND THE ONLY COME TO FRUITION, AND THE ONLY REASON, ARI, THAT THE MONEY WAS REASON, ARI, THAT THE MONEY WAS ULTIMATELY RELEASED WAS BECAUSE ULTIMATELY RELEASED WAS BECAUSE THEY GOT CAUGHT

THEY GOT CAUGHT AND HERE’S THE THING, IF YOU GET AND HERE’S THE THING, IF YOU GET CAUGHT BY THE WHISTLE-BLOWER CAUGHT BY THE WHISTLE-BLOWER OUTING YOU AND YOU ARE OUTING YOU AND YOU ARE RIGHTEOUSLY WITHHOLDING THAT RIGHTEOUSLY WITHHOLDING THAT MONEY FROM UKRAINE, YOU DON’T MONEY FROM UKRAINE, YOU DON’T HAVE TO CHANGE COURSE HAVE TO CHANGE COURSE YOU CAN SAY, LISTEN, THE YOU CAN SAY, LISTEN, THE WHISTLE-BLOWER’S OUT TO LUNCH, WHISTLE-BLOWER’S OUT TO LUNCH, WE MADE A DECISION WE MADE A DECISION

IT WAS RIGHTEOUS, IT WAS IT WAS RIGHTEOUS, IT WAS APPROPRIATE AND WE’RE GOING TO APPROPRIATE AND WE’RE GOING TO STICK WITH IT STICK WITH IT NOW, WHEN THEY GOT CAUGHT, NOW, WHEN THEY GOT CAUGHT, THAT’S WHEN THEY RELEASED THE THAT’S WHEN THEY RELEASED THE MONEY MONEY >> YOU MAKE A GREAT FINAL POINT >> YOU MAKE A GREAT FINAL POINT THERE WHICH IS EVERYONE CAN LINK THERE WHICH IS EVERYONE CAN LINK ARMS AND SAY WHAT HAPPENED IF ARMS AND SAY WHAT HAPPENED IF THERE’S EXCULPATORY MATERIAL

THERE’S EXCULPATORY MATERIAL ANY THOUGHTS ON THIS ROGER STONE ANY THOUGHTS ON THIS ROGER STONE TRIAL? TRIAL? >> THERE WERE SOME INTERESTING >> THERE WERE SOME INTERESTING DEVELOPMENTS TODAY BECAUSE WE DEVELOPMENTS TODAY BECAUSE WE GOT A LITTLE BIT OF A GLIMPSE GOT A LITTLE BIT OF A GLIMPSE INSIDE THE JURY DELIBERATION INSIDE THE JURY DELIBERATION ROOM ROOM THEY SENT TWO NOTES OUT AND THEY SENT TWO NOTES OUT AND THERE WERE SEVEN COUNTS THERE WERE SEVEN COUNTS

THE FIRST ONE IS OBSTRUCTING THE FIRST ONE IS OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE BY BASICALLY OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE BY BASICALLY OBSTRUCTING THE CONGRESSIONAL INQUIRY THE CONGRESSIONAL INQUIRY THEN THERE ARE FIVE COUNTS OF THEN THERE ARE FIVE COUNTS OF LYING TO CONGRESS, AND THEN LYING TO CONGRESS, AND THEN THERE’S A WITNESS TAMPERING FOR THERE’S A WITNESS TAMPERING FOR BASICALLY TELLING RANDY CREDICO BASICALLY TELLING RANDY CREDICO DO NOT TESTIFY, FORGET WHAT YOU DO NOT TESTIFY, FORGET WHAT YOU HEARD, THREATENING HIM HEARD, THREATENING HIM SO THIS ONE PERTAINING TO COUNT SO THIS ONE PERTAINING TO COUNT THREE, WHICH WAS THAT THE THREE, WHICH WAS THAT THE ALLEGATION IS THAT ROGER STONE ALLEGATION IS THAT ROGER STONE FALSELY TESTIFIED TO CONGRESS FALSELY TESTIFIED TO CONGRESS THAT RANDY CREDICO WAS HIS THAT RANDY CREDICO WAS HIS GO-BETWEEN BETWEEN JULIAN GO-BETWEEN BETWEEN JULIAN ASSANGE

ASSANGE THE WAY THE PROSECUTORS DRAFTED THE WAY THE PROSECUTORS DRAFTED THAT INDICTMENT, THERE WAS ONE THAT INDICTMENT, THERE WAS ONE EXPOSED BY THE JURY BECAUSE EXPOSED BY THE JURY BECAUSE ROGER STONE NEVER TESTIFIED ROGER STONE NEVER TESTIFIED RANDY CREDICO WAS HIS RANDY CREDICO WAS HIS GO-BETWEEN GO-BETWEEN HE TESTIFIED THAT A PERSON I HE TESTIFIED THAT A PERSON I WILL NOT NAME WAS MY GO-BETWEEN WILL NOT NAME WAS MY GO-BETWEEN

AND THE PROBLEM IS IT WASN’T AND THE PROBLEM IS IT WASN’T UNTIL AFTER HIS TESTIMONY WAS UNTIL AFTER HIS TESTIMONY WAS COMPLETE WHEN HIS LAWYER SENT A COMPLETE WHEN HIS LAWYER SENT A LETTER SAYING, BY THE WAY, THAT LETTER SAYING, BY THE WAY, THAT GO-BETWEEN, THAT PERSON UNNAMED GO-BETWEEN, THAT PERSON UNNAMED AS RANDY CREDICO — AS RANDY CREDICO — >> WHAT’S INTERESTING AS YOU >> WHAT’S INTERESTING AS YOU POINTED OUT IS SOMETIMES IT’S POINTED OUT IS SOMETIMES IT’S JURIES WHO ARE CITIZENS WHO FIND JURIES WHO ARE CITIZENS WHO FIND OUT THINGS AND NAIL THINGS AND OUT THINGS AND NAIL THINGS AND THEN THE WHOLE SYSTEM HAS TO THEN THE WHOLE SYSTEM HAS TO ADJUST ADJUST WE’RE KEEPING AN EYE ON THE

Source: Youtube

This div height required for enabling the sticky sidebar