Hit enter after type your search item
Wzy Word

HERE ARE THE WORLD'S NEWS

Breaking down Bill Cosby's appeal of his 2018 sexual assault conviction

/
/
/
90 Views
img

POINT, POINT, THE POINT, THE CONVERSATION POINT, THE CONVERSATION WITH POINT, THE CONVERSATION WITH JASON POINT, THE CONVERSATION WITH JASON FRAZIER POINT, THE CONVERSATION WITH JASON FRAZIER AT POINT, THE CONVERSATION WITH JASON FRAZIER AT 6:30 POINT, THE CONVERSATION WITH JASON FRAZIER AT 6:30 LIVE POINT, THE CONVERSATION WITH JASON FRAZIER AT 6:30 LIVE ON JASON FRAZIER AT 6:30 LIVE ON JASON FRAZIER AT 6:30 LIVE ON WKYCCOM JASON FRAZIER AT 6:30 LIVE ON WKYC

COM AND JASON FRAZIER AT 6:30 LIVE ON WKYCCOM AND THE JASON FRAZIER AT 6:30 LIVE ON WKYCCOM AND THE WKYC JASON FRAZIER AT 6:30 LIVE ON WKYCCOM AND THE WKYC APPS WKYC

COM AND THE WKYC APPS WKYCCOM AND THE WKYC APPS >>> WKYCCOM AND THE WKYC APPS

>>> JUST WKYCCOM AND THE WKYC APPS >>> JUST TODAY, WKYCCOM AND THE WKYC APPS >>> JUST TODAY, THERE WKYC

COM AND THE WKYC APPS >>> JUST TODAY, THERE HAS WKYCCOM AND THE WKYC APPS >>> JUST TODAY, THERE HAS BEEN >>> JUST TODAY, THERE HAS BEEN >>> JUST TODAY, THERE HAS BEEN A >>> JUST TODAY, THERE HAS BEEN A BIG >>> JUST TODAY, THERE HAS BEEN A BIG DEVELOPMENT >>> JUST TODAY, THERE HAS BEEN A BIG DEVELOPMENT IN >>> JUST TODAY, THERE HAS BEEN A BIG DEVELOPMENT IN BILL A BIG DEVELOPMENT IN BILL A BIG DEVELOPMENT IN BILL COSBY'S A BIG DEVELOPMENT IN BILL COSBY'S SEXUAL A BIG DEVELOPMENT IN BILL COSBY'S SEXUAL ASSAULT A BIG DEVELOPMENT IN BILL COSBY'S SEXUAL ASSAULT CASE COSBY'S SEXUAL ASSAULT CASE

COSBY'S SEXUAL ASSAULT CASE THE COSBY'S SEXUAL ASSAULT CASE THE PENNSYLVANIA COSBY'S SEXUAL ASSAULT CASE THE PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COSBY'S SEXUAL ASSAULT CASE THE PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT THE PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT THE PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT GRANTED THE PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT GRANTED HIM THE PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT GRANTED HIM AN THE PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT GRANTED HIM AN APPEAL THE PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT GRANTED HIM AN APPEAL OF THE PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT GRANTED HIM AN APPEAL OF HIS GRANTED HIM AN APPEAL OF HIS GRANTED HIM AN APPEAL OF HIS 2018 GRANTED HIM AN APPEAL OF HIS 2018 CONVICTION

2018 CONVICTION 2018 CONVICTION COSBY'S 2018 CONVICTION COSBY'S PUBLICIST 2018 CONVICTION COSBY'S PUBLICIST IS 2018 CONVICTION

COSBY'S PUBLICIST IS CLAIMING COSBY'S PUBLICIST IS CLAIMING COSBY'S PUBLICIST IS CLAIMING THIS COSBY'S PUBLICIST IS CLAIMING THIS IS COSBY'S PUBLICIST IS CLAIMING THIS IS BIGGER COSBY'S PUBLICIST IS CLAIMING THIS IS BIGGER THAN COSBY'S PUBLICIST IS CLAIMING THIS IS BIGGER THAN COSBY COSBY'S PUBLICIST IS CLAIMING THIS IS BIGGER THAN COSBY AND THIS IS BIGGER THAN COSBY AND THIS IS BIGGER THAN COSBY AND HIS THIS IS BIGGER THAN COSBY AND HIS CASE THIS IS BIGGER THAN COSBY AND HIS CASE IS THIS IS BIGGER THAN COSBY AND HIS CASE IS ABOUT THIS IS BIGGER THAN COSBY AND HIS CASE IS ABOUT THE HIS CASE IS ABOUT THE HIS CASE IS ABOUT THE DESTRUCTION HIS CASE IS ABOUT THE DESTRUCTION OF HIS CASE IS ABOUT THE DESTRUCTION OF BLACK HIS CASE IS ABOUT THE DESTRUCTION OF BLACK PEOPLE HIS CASE IS ABOUT THE DESTRUCTION OF BLACK PEOPLE IN DESTRUCTION OF BLACK PEOPLE IN DESTRUCTION OF BLACK PEOPLE IN AMERICA AMERICA AMERICA THREE AMERICA THREE NEWS AMERICA

THREE NEWS DIGITAL AMERICA THREE NEWS DIGITAL ANCHOR THREE NEWS DIGITAL ANCHOR THREE NEWS DIGITAL ANCHOR STEPHANIE THREE NEWS DIGITAL ANCHOR STEPHANIE HANEY, THREE NEWS DIGITAL ANCHOR STEPHANIE HANEY, WHO THREE NEWS DIGITAL ANCHOR STEPHANIE HANEY, WHO IS THREE NEWS DIGITAL ANCHOR STEPHANIE HANEY, WHO IS A STEPHANIE HANEY, WHO IS A STEPHANIE HANEY, WHO IS A LAWYER STEPHANIE HANEY, WHO IS A LAWYER AND STEPHANIE HANEY, WHO IS A LAWYER AND LEGAL STEPHANIE HANEY, WHO IS A LAWYER AND LEGAL ANALYST, STEPHANIE HANEY, WHO IS A LAWYER AND LEGAL ANALYST, IS LAWYER AND LEGAL ANALYST, IS LAWYER AND LEGAL ANALYST, IS HERE LAWYER AND LEGAL ANALYST, IS HERE TO LAWYER AND LEGAL ANALYST, IS HERE TO BREAK LAWYER AND LEGAL ANALYST, IS HERE TO BREAK THIS LAWYER AND LEGAL ANALYST, IS HERE TO BREAK THIS DOWN HERE TO BREAK THIS DOWN HERE TO BREAK THIS DOWN WHAT HERE TO BREAK THIS DOWN

WHAT IS HERE TO BREAK THIS DOWN WHAT IS BILL HERE TO BREAK THIS DOWN WHAT IS BILL COSBY HERE TO BREAK THIS DOWN WHAT IS BILL COSBY FIGHTING HERE TO BREAK THIS DOWN WHAT IS BILL COSBY FIGHTING FOR WHAT IS BILL COSBY FIGHTING FOR WHAT IS BILL COSBY FIGHTING FOR HERE? HERE? HERE? >> HERE? >> COSBY'S HERE? >> COSBY'S REP HERE? >> COSBY'S REP IS HERE? >> COSBY'S REP IS CALLING HERE? >> COSBY'S REP IS CALLING THIS >> COSBY'S REP IS CALLING THIS >> COSBY'S REP IS CALLING THIS A >> COSBY'S REP IS CALLING THIS A FALSE >> COSBY'S REP IS CALLING THIS A FALSE CONVICTION

A FALSE CONVICTION A FALSE CONVICTION INTERESTINGLY A FALSE CONVICTION INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH, A FALSE CONVICTION INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH, PART A FALSE CONVICTION

INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH, PART OF INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH, PART OF INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH, PART OF THE INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH, PART OF THE ARGUMENT INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH, PART OF THE ARGUMENT IS INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH, PART OF THE ARGUMENT IS NOT INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH, PART OF THE ARGUMENT IS NOT BASED INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH, PART OF THE ARGUMENT IS NOT BASED ON INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH, PART OF THE ARGUMENT IS NOT BASED ON A THE ARGUMENT IS NOT BASED ON A THE ARGUMENT IS NOT BASED ON A CLAIM THE ARGUMENT IS NOT BASED ON A CLAIM THAT THE ARGUMENT IS NOT BASED ON A CLAIM THAT COSBY THE ARGUMENT IS NOT BASED ON A CLAIM THAT COSBY IS THE ARGUMENT IS NOT BASED ON A CLAIM THAT COSBY IS INNOCENT CLAIM THAT COSBY IS INNOCENT CLAIM THAT COSBY IS INNOCENT IT CLAIM THAT COSBY IS INNOCENT IT IS CLAIM THAT COSBY IS INNOCENT

IT IS BASED CLAIM THAT COSBY IS INNOCENT IT IS BASED ON CLAIM THAT COSBY IS INNOCENT IT IS BASED ON PART CLAIM THAT COSBY IS INNOCENT IT IS BASED ON PART THAT IT IS BASED ON PART THAT IT IS BASED ON PART THAT STATEMENTS IT IS BASED ON PART THAT STATEMENTS COSBY IT IS BASED ON PART THAT STATEMENTS COSBY MADE IT IS BASED ON PART THAT STATEMENTS COSBY MADE HE IT IS BASED ON PART THAT STATEMENTS COSBY MADE HE SAYS STATEMENTS COSBY MADE HE SAYS STATEMENTS COSBY MADE HE SAYS INCRIMINATED STATEMENTS COSBY MADE HE SAYS INCRIMINATED HIM STATEMENTS COSBY MADE HE SAYS INCRIMINATED HIM THAT STATEMENTS COSBY MADE HE SAYS INCRIMINATED HIM THAT HE STATEMENTS COSBY MADE HE SAYS INCRIMINATED HIM THAT HE FEELS INCRIMINATED HIM THAT HE FEELS INCRIMINATED HIM THAT HE FEELS SHOULD INCRIMINATED HIM THAT HE FEELS SHOULD NOT INCRIMINATED HIM THAT HE FEELS SHOULD NOT HAVE INCRIMINATED HIM THAT HE FEELS SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN INCRIMINATED HIM THAT HE FEELS SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED AT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED AT TRIAL AT TRIAL

AT TRIAL THE AT TRIAL THE FIRST AT TRIAL THE FIRST OF AT TRIAL THE FIRST OF TWO AT TRIAL

THE FIRST OF TWO ISSUES AT TRIAL THE FIRST OF TWO ISSUES ON THE FIRST OF TWO ISSUES ON THE FIRST OF TWO ISSUES ON APPEAL THE FIRST OF TWO ISSUES ON APPEAL IS THE FIRST OF TWO ISSUES ON APPEAL IS WHETHER THE FIRST OF TWO ISSUES ON APPEAL IS WHETHER THE THE FIRST OF TWO ISSUES ON APPEAL IS WHETHER THE TRIAL APPEAL IS WHETHER THE TRIAL APPEAL IS WHETHER THE TRIAL JUDGE APPEAL IS WHETHER THE TRIAL JUDGE SHOULD APPEAL IS WHETHER THE TRIAL JUDGE SHOULD HAVE APPEAL IS WHETHER THE TRIAL JUDGE SHOULD HAVE A APPEAL IS WHETHER THE TRIAL JUDGE SHOULD HAVE A LOT APPEAL IS WHETHER THE TRIAL JUDGE SHOULD HAVE A LOT IN JUDGE SHOULD HAVE A LOT IN JUDGE SHOULD HAVE A LOT IN TESTIMONY JUDGE SHOULD HAVE A LOT IN TESTIMONY ABOUT JUDGE SHOULD HAVE A LOT IN TESTIMONY ABOUT A JUDGE SHOULD HAVE A LOT IN TESTIMONY ABOUT A STATEMENT TESTIMONY ABOUT A STATEMENT TESTIMONY ABOUT A STATEMENT COSBY TESTIMONY ABOUT A STATEMENT COSBY MADE TESTIMONY ABOUT A STATEMENT COSBY MADE UNDER TESTIMONY ABOUT A STATEMENT COSBY MADE UNDER OATH TESTIMONY ABOUT A STATEMENT COSBY MADE UNDER OATH FOR TESTIMONY ABOUT A STATEMENT COSBY MADE UNDER OATH FOR HIS COSBY MADE UNDER OATH FOR HIS COSBY MADE UNDER OATH FOR HIS CRIMINAL COSBY MADE UNDER OATH FOR HIS CRIMINAL TRIAL, COSBY MADE UNDER OATH FOR HIS CRIMINAL TRIAL, BUT COSBY MADE UNDER OATH FOR HIS CRIMINAL TRIAL, BUT AFTER COSBY MADE UNDER OATH FOR HIS CRIMINAL TRIAL, BUT AFTER HE CRIMINAL TRIAL, BUT AFTER HE CRIMINAL TRIAL, BUT AFTER HE SAYS CRIMINAL TRIAL, BUT AFTER HE SAYS HE CRIMINAL TRIAL, BUT AFTER HE SAYS HE WAS CRIMINAL TRIAL, BUT AFTER HE SAYS HE WAS PROMISED CRIMINAL TRIAL, BUT AFTER HE SAYS HE WAS PROMISED HE CRIMINAL TRIAL, BUT AFTER HE SAYS HE WAS PROMISED HE WOULD SAYS HE WAS PROMISED HE WOULD SAYS HE WAS PROMISED HE WOULD NOT SAYS HE WAS PROMISED HE WOULD NOT BE SAYS HE WAS PROMISED HE WOULD NOT BE PROSECUTED NOT BE PROSECUTED NOT BE PROSECUTED THE NOT BE PROSECUTED

THE QUESTION NOT BE PROSECUTED THE QUESTION IS NOT BE PROSECUTED THE QUESTION IS DOES NOT BE PROSECUTED THE QUESTION IS DOES THAT THE QUESTION IS DOES THAT THE QUESTION IS DOES THAT VIOLATE THE QUESTION IS DOES THAT VIOLATE HIS THE QUESTION IS DOES THAT VIOLATE HIS FIFTH THE QUESTION IS DOES THAT VIOLATE HIS FIFTH AMENDMENT VIOLATE HIS FIFTH AMENDMENT VIOLATE HIS FIFTH AMENDMENT RIGHT? RIGHT? RIGHT? COSBY RIGHT? COSBY COULD RIGHT? COSBY COULD HAVE RIGHT? COSBY COULD HAVE INVOKED RIGHT? COSBY COULD HAVE INVOKED THAT COSBY COULD HAVE INVOKED THAT COSBY COULD HAVE INVOKED THAT RIGHT COSBY COULD HAVE INVOKED THAT RIGHT DURING COSBY COULD HAVE INVOKED THAT RIGHT DURING THAT COSBY COULD HAVE INVOKED THAT RIGHT DURING THAT THIS COSBY COULD HAVE INVOKED THAT RIGHT DURING THAT THIS POSITION RIGHT DURING THAT THIS POSITION

RIGHT DURING THAT THIS POSITION THAT RIGHT DURING THAT THIS POSITION THAT WILL RIGHT DURING THAT THIS POSITION THAT WILL BE RIGHT DURING THAT THIS POSITION THAT WILL BE TOUGH RIGHT DURING THAT THIS POSITION

THAT WILL BE TOUGH FOR RIGHT DURING THAT THIS POSITION THAT WILL BE TOUGH FOR HIM THAT WILL BE TOUGH FOR HIM THAT WILL BE TOUGH FOR HIM THE THAT WILL BE TOUGH FOR HIM

THE OTHER THAT WILL BE TOUGH FOR HIM THE OTHER PART THAT WILL BE TOUGH FOR HIM THE OTHER PART OF THAT WILL BE TOUGH FOR HIM THE OTHER PART OF THIS THAT WILL BE TOUGH FOR HIM THE OTHER PART OF THIS ISSUE THAT WILL BE TOUGH FOR HIM

THE OTHER PART OF THIS ISSUE IS THE OTHER PART OF THIS ISSUE IS THE OTHER PART OF THIS ISSUE IS WHETHER THE OTHER PART OF THIS ISSUE IS WHETHER THAT THE OTHER PART OF THIS ISSUE IS WHETHER THAT ALLEGED THE OTHER PART OF THIS ISSUE IS WHETHER THAT ALLEGED DEAL THE OTHER PART OF THIS ISSUE IS WHETHER THAT ALLEGED DEAL NOT WHETHER THAT ALLEGED DEAL NOT WHETHER THAT ALLEGED DEAL NOT TO WHETHER THAT ALLEGED DEAL NOT TO PROSECUTE WHETHER THAT ALLEGED DEAL NOT TO PROSECUTE WAS WHETHER THAT ALLEGED DEAL NOT TO PROSECUTE WAS BINDING WHETHER THAT ALLEGED DEAL NOT TO PROSECUTE WAS BINDING AND TO PROSECUTE WAS BINDING AND TO PROSECUTE WAS BINDING AND WHETHER TO PROSECUTE WAS BINDING AND WHETHER THERE TO PROSECUTE WAS BINDING AND WHETHER THERE SHOULD TO PROSECUTE WAS BINDING AND WHETHER THERE SHOULD HAVE TO PROSECUTE WAS BINDING AND WHETHER THERE SHOULD HAVE EVER WHETHER THERE SHOULD HAVE EVER WHETHER THERE SHOULD HAVE EVER BEEN WHETHER THERE SHOULD HAVE EVER BEEN A WHETHER THERE SHOULD HAVE EVER BEEN A CRIMINAL WHETHER THERE SHOULD HAVE EVER BEEN A CRIMINAL TRIAL WHETHER THERE SHOULD HAVE EVER BEEN A CRIMINAL TRIAL IN WHETHER THERE SHOULD HAVE EVER BEEN A CRIMINAL TRIAL IN THE BEEN A CRIMINAL TRIAL IN THE BEEN A CRIMINAL TRIAL IN THE FIRST BEEN A CRIMINAL TRIAL IN THE FIRST PLACE FIRST PLACE FIRST PLACE THAT FIRST PLACE THAT ONE FIRST PLACE

THAT ONE IS FIRST PLACE THAT ONE IS MORE FIRST PLACE THAT ONE IS MORE COMPLICATED THAT ONE IS MORE COMPLICATED THAT ONE IS MORE COMPLICATED

>> THAT ONE IS MORE COMPLICATED >> I THAT ONE IS MORE COMPLICATED >> I THINK THAT ONE IS MORE COMPLICATED >> I THINK A THAT ONE IS MORE COMPLICATED >> I THINK A LOT THAT ONE IS MORE COMPLICATED

>> I THINK A LOT OF THAT ONE IS MORE COMPLICATED >> I THINK A LOT OF PEOPLE THAT ONE IS MORE COMPLICATED >> I THINK A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE >> I THINK A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE >> I THINK A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE VERY >> I THINK A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE VERY CONFUSED >> I THINK A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE VERY CONFUSED ABOUT >> I THINK A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE VERY CONFUSED ABOUT WHAT >> I THINK A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE VERY CONFUSED ABOUT WHAT ALL >> I THINK A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE VERY CONFUSED ABOUT WHAT ALL OF VERY CONFUSED ABOUT WHAT ALL OF VERY CONFUSED ABOUT WHAT ALL OF THIS VERY CONFUSED ABOUT WHAT ALL OF THIS ENDS VERY CONFUSED ABOUT WHAT ALL OF THIS ENDS UP VERY CONFUSED ABOUT WHAT ALL OF THIS ENDS UP MEANING THIS ENDS UP MEANING THIS ENDS UP MEANING

I THIS ENDS UP MEANING I KNOW THIS ENDS UP MEANING I KNOW HE THIS ENDS UP MEANING I KNOW HE IS THIS ENDS UP MEANING I KNOW HE IS ALSO THIS ENDS UP MEANING

I KNOW HE IS ALSO ARGUING THIS ENDS UP MEANING I KNOW HE IS ALSO ARGUING ABOUT I KNOW HE IS ALSO ARGUING ABOUT I KNOW HE IS ALSO ARGUING ABOUT THE I KNOW HE IS ALSO ARGUING ABOUT THE OTHER I KNOW HE IS ALSO ARGUING ABOUT THE OTHER PEOPLE I KNOW HE IS ALSO ARGUING ABOUT THE OTHER PEOPLE WHO I KNOW HE IS ALSO ARGUING ABOUT THE OTHER PEOPLE WHO WERE THE OTHER PEOPLE WHO WERE THE OTHER PEOPLE WHO WERE ALLOWED THE OTHER PEOPLE WHO WERE ALLOWED TO THE OTHER PEOPLE WHO WERE ALLOWED TO TESTIFY THE OTHER PEOPLE WHO WERE ALLOWED TO TESTIFY AT THE OTHER PEOPLE WHO WERE ALLOWED TO TESTIFY AT HIS THE OTHER PEOPLE WHO WERE ALLOWED TO TESTIFY AT HIS TRIAL ALLOWED TO TESTIFY AT HIS TRIAL ALLOWED TO TESTIFY AT HIS TRIAL >> ALLOWED TO TESTIFY AT HIS TRIAL

>> THAT ALLOWED TO TESTIFY AT HIS TRIAL >> THAT IS ALLOWED TO TESTIFY AT HIS TRIAL >> THAT IS RIGHT >> THAT IS RIGHT >> THAT IS RIGHT

THE >> THAT IS RIGHT THE SECOND >> THAT IS RIGHT THE SECOND ISSUE >> THAT IS RIGHT THE SECOND ISSUE IS >> THAT IS RIGHT THE SECOND ISSUE IS WHETHER >> THAT IS RIGHT

THE SECOND ISSUE IS WHETHER THE THE SECOND ISSUE IS WHETHER THE THE SECOND ISSUE IS WHETHER THE TRIAL THE SECOND ISSUE IS WHETHER THE TRIAL JUDGE THE SECOND ISSUE IS WHETHER THE TRIAL JUDGE ALLOWING THE SECOND ISSUE IS WHETHER THE TRIAL JUDGE ALLOWING OTHER TRIAL JUDGE ALLOWING OTHER TRIAL JUDGE ALLOWING OTHER ACCUSERS TRIAL JUDGE ALLOWING OTHER ACCUSERS TO TRIAL JUDGE ALLOWING OTHER ACCUSERS TO TESTIFY TRIAL JUDGE ALLOWING OTHER ACCUSERS TO TESTIFY ABOUT ACCUSERS TO TESTIFY ABOUT ACCUSERS TO TESTIFY ABOUT ALLEGATIONS ACCUSERS TO TESTIFY ABOUT ALLEGATIONS THAT ACCUSERS TO TESTIFY ABOUT ALLEGATIONS THAT WERE ACCUSERS TO TESTIFY ABOUT ALLEGATIONS THAT WERE NOT ALLEGATIONS THAT WERE NOT ALLEGATIONS THAT WERE NOT BROUGHT ALLEGATIONS THAT WERE NOT BROUGHT TO ALLEGATIONS THAT WERE NOT BROUGHT TO A ALLEGATIONS THAT WERE NOT BROUGHT TO A COURT ALLEGATIONS THAT WERE NOT BROUGHT TO A COURT AGAINST ALLEGATIONS THAT WERE NOT BROUGHT TO A COURT AGAINST COPY BROUGHT TO A COURT AGAINST COPY BROUGHT TO A COURT AGAINST COPY WAS BROUGHT TO A COURT AGAINST COPY WAS MORE BROUGHT TO A COURT AGAINST COPY WAS MORE PRESIDENTIAL BROUGHT TO A COURT AGAINST COPY WAS MORE PRESIDENTIAL THAN WAS MORE PRESIDENTIAL THAN WAS MORE PRESIDENTIAL THAN PROBATIVE PROBATIVE PROBATIVE THE PROBATIVE THE QUESTION PROBATIVE

THE QUESTION IS PROBATIVE THE QUESTION IS WHETHER PROBATIVE THE QUESTION IS WHETHER IT PROBATIVE THE QUESTION IS WHETHER IT DID THE QUESTION IS WHETHER IT DID THE QUESTION IS WHETHER IT DID MORE THE QUESTION IS WHETHER IT DID MORE HARM THE QUESTION IS WHETHER IT DID MORE HARM TO THE QUESTION IS WHETHER IT DID MORE HARM TO COSBY THE QUESTION IS WHETHER IT DID MORE HARM TO COSBY JUST THE QUESTION IS WHETHER IT DID MORE HARM TO COSBY JUST BY MORE HARM TO COSBY JUST BY MORE HARM TO COSBY JUST BY SUGGESTION MORE HARM TO COSBY JUST BY SUGGESTION THAT MORE HARM TO COSBY JUST BY SUGGESTION THAT I MORE HARM TO COSBY JUST BY SUGGESTION THAT I DID MORE HARM TO COSBY JUST BY SUGGESTION THAT I DID TO MORE HARM TO COSBY JUST BY SUGGESTION THAT I DID TO HELP SUGGESTION THAT I DID TO HELP SUGGESTION THAT I DID TO HELP THE SUGGESTION THAT I DID TO HELP THE JURY SUGGESTION THAT I DID TO HELP THE JURY BY SUGGESTION THAT I DID TO HELP THE JURY BY PROVIDING SUGGESTION THAT I DID TO HELP THE JURY BY PROVIDING THEM SUGGESTION THAT I DID TO HELP THE JURY BY PROVIDING THEM WITH THE JURY BY PROVIDING THEM WITH THE JURY BY PROVIDING THEM WITH VALUABLE THE JURY BY PROVIDING THEM WITH VALUABLE EVIDENCE VALUABLE EVIDENCE

VALUABLE EVIDENCE WE VALUABLE EVIDENCE WE USUALLY VALUABLE EVIDENCE WE USUALLY SEE VALUABLE EVIDENCE WE USUALLY SEE OTHER VALUABLE EVIDENCE

WE USUALLY SEE OTHER ACCUSERS WE USUALLY SEE OTHER ACCUSERS WE USUALLY SEE OTHER ACCUSERS TESTIFY WE USUALLY SEE OTHER ACCUSERS TESTIFY A WE USUALLY SEE OTHER ACCUSERS TESTIFY A SENTENCING WE USUALLY SEE OTHER ACCUSERS TESTIFY A SENTENCING AFTER WE USUALLY SEE OTHER ACCUSERS TESTIFY A SENTENCING AFTER A TESTIFY A SENTENCING AFTER A TESTIFY A SENTENCING AFTER A CONVICTION CONVICTION CONVICTION THAT CONVICTION THAT WAS CONVICTION

THAT WAS NOT CONVICTION THAT WAS NOT ALLOWED CONVICTION THAT WAS NOT ALLOWED IN CONVICTION THAT WAS NOT ALLOWED IN COSBY'S THAT WAS NOT ALLOWED IN COSBY'S THAT WAS NOT ALLOWED IN COSBY'S CASE, THAT WAS NOT ALLOWED IN COSBY'S CASE, EVEN THAT WAS NOT ALLOWED IN COSBY'S CASE, EVEN THOUGH THAT WAS NOT ALLOWED IN COSBY'S CASE, EVEN THOUGH THEY THAT WAS NOT ALLOWED IN COSBY'S CASE, EVEN THOUGH THEY DID CASE, EVEN THOUGH THEY DID CASE, EVEN THOUGH THEY DID TESTIFY CASE, EVEN THOUGH THEY DID TESTIFY AT CASE, EVEN THOUGH THEY DID TESTIFY AT TRIAL, CASE, EVEN THOUGH THEY DID TESTIFY AT TRIAL, WHICH CASE, EVEN THOUGH THEY DID TESTIFY AT TRIAL, WHICH IS CASE, EVEN THOUGH THEY DID TESTIFY AT TRIAL, WHICH IS A TESTIFY AT TRIAL, WHICH IS A TESTIFY AT TRIAL, WHICH IS A BIT TESTIFY AT TRIAL, WHICH IS A BIT UNUSUAL BIT UNUSUAL

BIT UNUSUAL COSBY'S BIT UNUSUAL COSBY'S ATTORNEYS BIT UNUSUAL COSBY'S ATTORNEYS WILL BIT UNUSUAL COSBY'S ATTORNEYS WILL TRY BIT UNUSUAL

COSBY'S ATTORNEYS WILL TRY TO COSBY'S ATTORNEYS WILL TRY TO COSBY'S ATTORNEYS WILL TRY TO ARGUE COSBY'S ATTORNEYS WILL TRY TO ARGUE THAT COSBY'S ATTORNEYS WILL TRY TO ARGUE THAT ALLOWING COSBY'S ATTORNEYS WILL TRY TO ARGUE THAT ALLOWING THAT ARGUE THAT ALLOWING THAT ARGUE THAT ALLOWING THAT TESTIMONY ARGUE THAT ALLOWING THAT TESTIMONY TOOK ARGUE THAT ALLOWING THAT TESTIMONY TOOK AWAY ARGUE THAT ALLOWING THAT TESTIMONY TOOK AWAY THE TESTIMONY TOOK AWAY THE TESTIMONY TOOK AWAY THE PRESUMPTION TESTIMONY TOOK AWAY THE PRESUMPTION OF TESTIMONY TOOK AWAY THE PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE TESTIMONY TOOK AWAY THE PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE IN TESTIMONY TOOK AWAY THE PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE IN THE PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE IN THE PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE IN THE JURY'S PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE IN THE JURY'S MIND JURY'S MIND JURY'S MIND AS JURY'S MIND AS WE JURY'S MIND

AS WE ALL JURY'S MIND AS WE ALL KNOW JURY'S MIND AS WE ALL KNOW IN JURY'S MIND AS WE ALL KNOW IN THE JURY'S MIND AS WE ALL KNOW IN THE U

S, JURY'S MIND AS WE ALL KNOW IN THE US, AT AS WE ALL KNOW IN THE U

S, AT AS WE ALL KNOW IN THE US, AT LEAST AS WE ALL KNOW IN THE US

, AT LEAST IN AS WE ALL KNOW IN THE US, AT LEAST IN THEORY, AS WE ALL KNOW IN THE US, AT LEAST IN THEORY, WE AS WE ALL KNOW IN THE U

S, AT LEAST IN THEORY, WE ARE AS WE ALL KNOW IN THE US, AT LEAST IN THEORY, WE ARE ASSUMED LEAST IN THEORY, WE ARE ASSUMED LEAST IN THEORY, WE ARE ASSUMED INNOCENT LEAST IN THEORY, WE ARE ASSUMED INNOCENT UNTIL LEAST IN THEORY, WE ARE ASSUMED INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN LEAST IN THEORY, WE ARE ASSUMED INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY

INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY >> INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY >> THAT INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY >> THAT IS INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY >> THAT IS TRUE

>> THAT IS TRUE >> THAT IS TRUE WE >> THAT IS TRUE WE HAVE >> THAT IS TRUE WE HAVE THAT >> THAT IS TRUE

WE HAVE THAT FIGURED >> THAT IS TRUE WE HAVE THAT FIGURED OUT WE HAVE THAT FIGURED OUT WE HAVE THAT FIGURED OUT THIS WE HAVE THAT FIGURED OUT

THIS WAS WE HAVE THAT FIGURED OUT THIS WAS ABOUT WE HAVE THAT FIGURED OUT THIS WAS ABOUT HIS WE HAVE THAT FIGURED OUT THIS WAS ABOUT HIS 2018 THIS WAS ABOUT HIS 2018 THIS WAS ABOUT HIS 2018 CONVICTION CONVICTION

CONVICTION WHAT CONVICTION WHAT HAPPENS CONVICTION WHAT HAPPENS IF CONVICTION WHAT HAPPENS IF HIS CONVICTION

WHAT HAPPENS IF HIS APPEAL CONVICTION WHAT HAPPENS IF HIS APPEAL IS WHAT HAPPENS IF HIS APPEAL IS WHAT HAPPENS IF HIS APPEAL IS SUCCESSFUL? SUCCESSFUL? SUCCESSFUL? >> SUCCESSFUL? >> IT SUCCESSFUL? >> IT IS SUCCESSFUL? >> IT IS POSSIBLE SUCCESSFUL? >> IT IS POSSIBLE HE SUCCESSFUL? >> IT IS POSSIBLE HE COULD SUCCESSFUL? >> IT IS POSSIBLE HE COULD END >> IT IS POSSIBLE HE COULD END >> IT IS POSSIBLE HE COULD END UP >> IT IS POSSIBLE HE COULD END UP WITH >> IT IS POSSIBLE HE COULD END UP WITH A >> IT IS POSSIBLE HE COULD END UP WITH A NEW >> IT IS POSSIBLE HE COULD END UP WITH A NEW TRIAL UP WITH A NEW TRIAL UP WITH A NEW TRIAL HE UP WITH A NEW TRIAL

HE HAS UP WITH A NEW TRIAL HE HAS ALREADY UP WITH A NEW TRIAL HE HAS ALREADY HAD UP WITH A NEW TRIAL HE HAS ALREADY HAD TWO UP WITH A NEW TRIAL HE HAS ALREADY HAD TWO OF UP WITH A NEW TRIAL

HE HAS ALREADY HAD TWO OF THEM, HE HAS ALREADY HAD TWO OF THEM, HE HAS ALREADY HAD TWO OF THEM, BECAUSE HE HAS ALREADY HAD TWO OF THEM, BECAUSE THE HE HAS ALREADY HAD TWO OF THEM, BECAUSE THE FIRST HE HAS ALREADY HAD TWO OF THEM, BECAUSE THE FIRST ONE HE HAS ALREADY HAD TWO OF THEM, BECAUSE THE FIRST ONE ENDED HE HAS ALREADY HAD TWO OF THEM, BECAUSE THE FIRST ONE ENDED IN BECAUSE THE FIRST ONE ENDED IN BECAUSE THE FIRST ONE ENDED IN A BECAUSE THE FIRST ONE ENDED IN A MISTRIAL BECAUSE THE FIRST ONE ENDED IN A MISTRIAL BECAUSE BECAUSE THE FIRST ONE ENDED IN A MISTRIAL BECAUSE THE BECAUSE THE FIRST ONE ENDED IN A MISTRIAL BECAUSE THE JURY A MISTRIAL BECAUSE THE JURY A MISTRIAL BECAUSE THE JURY COULDN'T A MISTRIAL BECAUSE THE JURY COULDN'T AGREE A MISTRIAL BECAUSE THE JURY COULDN'T AGREE ON A MISTRIAL BECAUSE THE JURY COULDN'T AGREE ON THE A MISTRIAL BECAUSE THE JURY COULDN'T AGREE ON THE VERDICT COULDN'T AGREE ON THE VERDICT COULDN'T AGREE ON THE VERDICT THEN COULDN'T AGREE ON THE VERDICT THEN HE COULDN'T AGREE ON THE VERDICT

THEN HE WAS COULDN'T AGREE ON THE VERDICT THEN HE WAS LATER COULDN'T AGREE ON THE VERDICT THEN HE WAS LATER CONVICTED COULDN'T AGREE ON THE VERDICT THEN HE WAS LATER CONVICTED IN THEN HE WAS LATER CONVICTED IN THEN HE WAS LATER CONVICTED IN 2018 2018

2018 THAT 2018 THAT IS 2018 THAT IS WHY 2018 THAT IS WHY HE 2018

THAT IS WHY HE IS 2018 THAT IS WHY HE IS IN 2018 THAT IS WHY HE IS IN PRISON THAT IS WHY HE IS IN PRISON THAT IS WHY HE IS IN PRISON

HE THAT IS WHY HE IS IN PRISON HE SHOULD THAT IS WHY HE IS IN PRISON HE SHOULD STAY THAT IS WHY HE IS IN PRISON HE SHOULD STAY IN THAT IS WHY HE IS IN PRISON HE SHOULD STAY IN CUSTODY HE SHOULD STAY IN CUSTODY HE SHOULD STAY IN CUSTODY THROUGH HE SHOULD STAY IN CUSTODY THROUGH THIS HE SHOULD STAY IN CUSTODY THROUGH THIS APPEAL

THROUGH THIS APPEAL THROUGH THIS APPEAL >> THROUGH THIS APPEAL >> I'M THROUGH THIS APPEAL >> I'M GOING THROUGH THIS APPEAL

>> I'M GOING TO THROUGH THIS APPEAL >> I'M GOING TO SAY THROUGH THIS APPEAL >> I'M GOING TO SAY IT THROUGH THIS APPEAL >> I'M GOING TO SAY IT LIKE

Source: Youtube

This div height required for enabling the sticky sidebar